MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,223
People want to believe there's some huge, grand conspiracy at work, here. There isn't.
Far as Keyes is concerned, his killing career is a perfect example of a killer with relatively random victims. Like BG, he had his killing spots already picked out. Earlier in his killing career, he killed in large public parks, finding victims in out-of-the-way spots.
Big difference between that, where Keyes even admitted during questioning that he killed people earlier on that he figured would not be found, and there wouldn't be any big news or fuss made about them missing. They were missing, and never found.
BG wanted the victims in this case to be found, but long after he vanished from the immediate area. Hours later, in this case almost a full day after he first stalked the girls. He gets off on that thrill, the public's and the families' horror of realizing that two girls who had gone missing and were believed to not be in danger, were found murdered on someone's land not much more than 600 feet/200 meters from the bridge where they'd gone missing.
Keyes didn't want his earlier victims to be found or even reported about in the news. BG gets off on his victims being in the news, on Websleuths, on Reddit, on SM, etc. The horror is not only what he did, but the aftermath. That and BG killed juveniles. The public is infatuated with the crimes, almost 3.5 years later. BG loves that.
I believe there's way more to that or those aspects to his crimes, than conjuring up some big story on what may have happened that day.
JMO
Your comment about the killer thriving on the sensation this case has attracted reminds me of something else I’ve thought about.
The early news continually focused on increasingly growing reward day by day, week by week. Coverage if it was so successful that sometimes I got the impression FB saw solving this case similar to a lottery draw, find a facial resemblance and send in a ballot!
Rewards are a good thing but they’re usually not offered mere days into an investigation, a time when it’s hoped witnesses will willingly offer up information to LE to do the right thing, as opposed to doing it for payment. I also recall speculation early on over the possibility of good, fruitful tips being held back because the tipster might be waiting for the reward to grow even higher. The opposite could pose a problem as well, false information by people inserting themselves on the prospect of payback.
The reward isn’t talked about much any more but IMO it was a highly attention-grabbing component of media reporting especially during the first couple years.
So I would hope LE has scrutinized the reward organizers and donor list to ensure the perpetrator didn’t use it as a smokescreen to increase publicity while providing him with the appearance of honourable intentions. Rumour once had it the immediate family was collecting the reward money but as I recall, that was debunked as totally false. Who the actual organizers of the reward fund are has never been publicized, as far as I know.
JMO