Tiger Stripes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
- Messages
- 851
- Reaction score
- 6,106
Though admonishments to others about the dangers of DNA tests and not to give blood may be a little less likely (younger members of the family would probably view such an admonishment as in invitation to openly speculate), I think the idea of the older BG personal having a quiet protector is not improbable at all.
(S&BBM)
^^^This.
(And -- hypothetically speaking, of course -- whether or not such a "protector" is a parent, a sibling in the area, or just a good friend with whom the killer has always been in touch, that person *is* still "protecting" the killer. Just sayin'.
But -- who knows? -- maybe the "protector" doesn't even **know** the word "accomplice". Is that even *possible*, to "cover" for a relative or a good friend, without knowing/understanding the legal implications of such "protecting"? Hard to imagine...)