Happy to clarify what I'm confused about.
From the first article I read about JBC, I was sold on him for Bridge Guy. Everything about him was the perfect match. I knew there was a chance it could all be a coincidence, but the odds seemed ridiculous.
The Gray Hughes podcast interview with Anonymous Insider Hearsayer seemed fairly plausible to me. It didn't hurt that, if all that stuff about impressive strength is true, that JBC with his impulsiveness and prison muscles was uniquely suited for the role of BG in what the phone caller was telling Hughes.
Then, however, I considered the attack JBC performed on his known victim. This guy leaves DNA. He's not exactly the Napoleon of Crime.
But the podcast version of BG left no DNA. Maybe JBC did it and the podcast is bogus. Maybe the podcast has good info and JBC isn't the guy. But I can't buy JBC leaving no DNA.
So suddenly nothing is clear. Not even my posts.
Maybe even the podcast is bogus and JBC didn't do
this one.