AC4RD
"Huic accedit undecim." (Cicero)
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2019
- Messages
- 499
- Reaction score
- 5,057
(snipped for focus) Snow, amigo, nobody here is likely to think you're questioning our goodwill, intelligence, or personal hygiene.I know I will not be popular and I in no way question the goodwill, integratory or abilities of a well-known True Crime Personality.
[... ... ]
Sorry for my alternative thoughts and no offence meant to the Youtube Personality ultimately you plotted where the girls were and where the video was taken from like us you do not know what happened after the video.
We've almost all been there and the overwhelming majority of us are absolutely used to people with different opinions. We don't mind! We welcome speculation, theories, ideas, and WAG (wild-a55 guesses.)
Speaking of half--baked speculation and guessing, I was pondering this recently. This may be absolutely incorrect, only true in the Southern Hemisphere (where theories go down the drain in the opposite direction), dumb, whatever, but I'll invite critical rebuttal. Ready?
It is often noted that police have not specifically called KAK a suspect or a POI in the Delphi murders, right? The lawn forcement community (I think!) has only discussed KAK's incarceration and approaching trial with reference to the CSAM. Not mentioning the murders in connection with KAK at all, is that still true?
So here's my wild-a55 speculation: What if LE and the prosecution already have some reasonably significant evidence linking KAK to the murders? We don't know what they have; they certainly aren't mentioning whatever actual evidence they may have. So imagine they have some evidence that incriminates KAK. Is it plausible to imagine that they're staying resolutely silent about KAK and the murders and this hypothetical evidence? KAK is in jail and he is clearly not going anywhere soon, so they don't have to worry that he will disappear.
And they are staying silent (in this hypothesis) because as soon as he is named as a POI his lawyers would have information they could use in whatever defense they prepare? I think there's no "discovery" until arraignment or a trial date is set, though I don't know for sure. But for now, he's safely in jail, and the police can develop a case (if they do have one) without legal interference?
Just speculating. BTW, thanks to all of you who welcomed me back.