If she cannot remember then it is no alibi. Often with a scan, people make a big deal and take a photo of themselves with the scan pic.She probably simply had it on her calendar. No clue why she wouldn't remember if he was there or not, though!
Or because of the murders.Perhaps the date is easy to remember because of Valentines Day?
If I, not knowing DN or ever having seen or heard him in real life, saw the sketch, or the BG still photo, and then I saw DN's photo, I don't think I would immediately put two and two together.... *however*.. when you put DN's photo beside each of those others, it sure matches, imho. I was shocked when I put them side by side on my computer screen. I showed someone, and they (without knowing anything about who it was, or what the case was, etc), immediately said, 'yeah, same person' - there wasn't a doubt in that person's mind, just looking at them compared together, out of the blue. For *both* the sketch and the BG photo. And then looking at the pic of what we *know* to be DN inside the red vehicle, wearing the hat, and then look at the hat in the BG sketch.. wow! On its own, the sketch may not seem like an exact replica of what one might have in their head as DN's image, but when compared together, there are SO many likenesses... mouth, nose, eyebrows, facial hair.. and if one thinks that this was just a drawing based on perhaps a *few* peoples' memories.. it seems like a darned good likeness, imho. Composite drawings are never going to look like the actual person, but would give a person who knew the person and saw the drawing, with the possibility that it *could* be that person, it sure gives reason for pause. jmo.
Then there is this guy who was charged with felony menacing for chasing someone with a hatchet in 2016 at a homeless camp in CO springs!
https://www.google.com/amp/fox21new...-at-another-man-in-colorado-springs-park/amp/
http://fox59.com/2017/09/29/man-cal...same-week-girls-bodies-were-found-police-say/
So, KN states he may or may not have been with her at the OB appointment on the 13th, and she did take him to his registration on the 14th. DN states he is living "under a bridge" when he checked in for his weekly registrations , yet KN states they watched the news together after the girls were murdered. You can't have it both ways! Either he was homeless or not, OR she was with him or not. Someone is not telling the truth!
Where is the photo of DN in the red car? Can you provide a link for me. I have obviously missed it. I was out of town for awhile. THanks
It is just a few pages back. Could whoever posted it please bump the post? Thanks.Where is the photo of DN in the red car? Can you provide a link for me. I have obviously missed it. I was out of town for awhile. THanks
Yes they have his DNA - there is no way they don't - the crime scene DNA either doesnt match or their DNA sample is not high enough quality to be use as evidence.
Then there is this guy who was charged with felony menacing for chasing someone with a hatchet in 2016 at a homeless camp in CO springs!
https://www.google.com/amp/fox21new...-at-another-man-in-colorado-springs-park/amp/
<modsnip>
Katelyn Nations says she does think her husband looks like the sketch of the murder suspect released by police.
I have been with Daniel for six years now and looking at that picture there is a lot of similarities, she said.
When asked if she thought her husband was connected to the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German, she said she couldn't say for sure one way or the other.
Honestly I do not want to say that I can see him doing it or not, said Katelyn.
<modsnip>
I remember watching it with him and just sitting there and shaking my head and I said, 'Can you believe this crap?' He said, 'No that is disgusting,' said Katelyn.
<modsnip>
Even everything that I have been through with Daniel I did not think he was somebody that I thought could do something of this magnitude, said Katelyn.
<modsnip>
http://fox59.com/2017/10/11/wife-of...rs-says-daniel-nations-watched-news-coverage/
Sent from my VK815 using Tapatalk
“No, that is disgusting.
“...that is...”
Not “that’s” but, “that is”
IIRC, when we are being deceptive, language turns more formal. It’s a big red flag in the written detection of deception (which I have studied).
MOO but it’s been bothering me immensely.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, since you wrote when we are... (rather than when were...), should we conclude that youre being deceptive?
Or because of the murders.