msstinky
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2017
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 67
Some of mine have gone a bit strange, probably missing end brackets or such like.
I don't think they run a complementary ancestry profile when they take a perp's DNA for the sex offender database. JMO
I don't. I don't know that makes him guilty, but I find some inconsistencies. [snipped by me]
-he is a loving father of 3 kids.
He doesn't have three kids. He has 2. One of KN's kids is not DN's. If he has 3, where is the third.l? If there are two, what a stupid thing to lie about.
-he doesn't have a hat like BG. But how does he know what kind of hat BG wears unless he just means the sketch?
Am linking a site about Parabon Snapshot DNA and includes this quote: "[FONT=&]Snapshot report and composite sketch that includes eye color, skin color, hair color, face morphology, and detailed b[/FONT]iogeographic[FONT=&] ancestry." Which is exactly what the description of DN's Race description is; biogeographical. This is not an ancestry profile which is based on your linked maternal and paternal heritage.
https://snapshot.parabon-nanolabs.com/
[/FONT]
Am linking a site about Parabon Snapshot DNA and includes this quote: "[FONT=&]Snapshot report and composite sketch that includes eye color, skin color, hair color, face morphology, and detailed b[/FONT]iogeographic[FONT=&] ancestry." Which is exactly what the description of DN's Race description is; biogeographical. This is not an ancestry profile which is based on your linked maternal and paternal heritage.
https://snapshot.parabon-nanolabs.com/
[/FONT]
So maybe Co took two cheek swabs and gave one to ISP? You're right regarding the facts and contradicting info. It still doesn't explain why they have no results back yet though.
I think Daey's point is we don't know what sort of a hat BG had, so to say I don't have a hat like that is not believable. How would he know what sort of hat BG had unless he was there? If he means he doesn't have a hat like in the sketch, we already know that because LE came out and said it wasn't an accurate depiction of the hat. So he is less believable because of that. JMO.Just my thoughts: I dont know the age of KNs first born, but its not unusual for a member of a blended family to refer to all kids as his/her own - even if its not biologically so. (Not speculating whether or not the sentiment/actions are true in this case.)
Re: the hat. Is the cap to which hes referring the same one in the sketch that the LE said NOT to focus on the style? Im not sure how a proclamation of I do not own a cap like the one depicted in the sketch...the one that police has said is merely a representation of **advertiser censored* cap, not necessarily the one the suspect may have been wearing. That only carries weight if he does not own any caps, nor did he own any on Feb. 13th, nor did he borrow one on Feb. 13th.
I think Daey's point is we don't know what sort of a hat BG had, so to say I don't have a hat like that is not believable. How would he know what sort of hat BG had unless he was there? If he means he doesn't have a hat like in the sketch, we already know that because LE came out and said it wasn't an accurate depiction of the hat. So he is less believable because of that. JMO.
I can't understand why they put that hat on that sketch. It is not a cap commonly worn in the US. A baseball type hat would be far more likely to be worn. They put that cap on him and say 'ignore the cap', but it is more distinctive than an common baseball type cap.I think Daey's point is we don't know what sort of a hat BG had, so to say I don't have a hat like that is not believable. How would he know what sort of hat BG had unless he was there? If he means he doesn't have a hat like in the sketch, we already know that because LE came out and said it wasn't an accurate depiction of the hat. So he is less believable because of that. JMO.
:thinking:
I can't understand why they put that hat on that sketch. It is not a cap commonly worn in the US. A baseball type hat would be far more likely to be worn. They put that cap on him and say 'ignore the cap', but it is more distinctive than an common baseball type cap.
:laughing:What a shame, he didn't name (!!!) the white thing and said, he never ever had this ....![]()
I can't understand why they put that hat on that sketch. It is not a cap commonly worn in the US. A baseball type hat would be far more likely to be worn. They put that cap on him and say 'ignore the cap', but it is more distinctive than an common baseball type cap.
http://fox59.com/2017/07/17/police-...hi-teens-liberty-german-and-abigail-williams/The eye color is unknown, but according to one witness, his eyes are not blue. Additionally, this sketch depicts a hat that may not be accurate.
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/seeking-info/unknown-suspect-2/@@download.pdfHis eye color is unknown. The sketch includes a hat that the suspect may or may not wear
.http://fox59.com/2017/07/17/police-...hi-teens-liberty-german-and-abigail-williams/"It shows a little more facial features it gives you a little more information on what were looking at, who the suspect might be, and thats why we feel that its very important that this picture is out there at this time." Police say it's very important for the public to focus on the facial features.
So you think this could mean DN has had a Parabon Snapshot DNA profile test done?
I keep seeing here that LE said "ignore the cap". which is not true IIRC.
http://fox59.com/2017/07/17/police-...hi-teens-liberty-german-and-abigail-williams/
From the FBI poster;
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/seeking-info/unknown-suspect-2/@@download.pdf
They did say though;
.http://fox59.com/2017/07/17/police-...hi-teens-liberty-german-and-abigail-williams/
I can't find anywhere that LE has said "ignore the cap/hat". Why would they? It may not be accurate, he may or may not wear the one depicted but focus on the facial features. I can see the confusion with a witness who only wears ball caps for instance - no it's not that poofy, more narrow, no not like that - can't remember, etc.
Many of us thought he wore a hat, some say no, same confusion IMO. but if there was no hat, why not describe his hair - bald, parted on the left, right, middle, comb-over... some kind of hat. Apparently not a ball cap.
Mostly JMO.