Imo not a chanceDoes anyone think BG knows any of the family members? I mean, what if he is someone right under their noses and nobody suspects him at all!
Also, does anyone think he helped in the search?
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Imo not a chanceDoes anyone think BG knows any of the family members? I mean, what if he is someone right under their noses and nobody suspects him at all!
Also, does anyone think he helped in the search?
I'm trying to think of circumstances where there would be no DNA. Such as being unclothed and submerged under water. We know that wasn't the case. At the least there will always be touch and transfer DNA. That just can't be avoided.Its possible no DNA was left behind.
No, he left the bag at the kill site while he went off to get his victims. Once he returned with the girls, it was there waiting for him. Obviously, he would take it with him when he left.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Its possible no DNA was left behind.
(Indiana State Police Sgt. Kim Riley) said police also have obtained samples of Nations' DNA, which has become a common procedure over the course of the seven-month-long investigation. He added that the samples will be compared to evidence gathered at the crime scene.
"We check DNA on everybody that has been investigated," Riley said. "Every person that we have talked to, we've gotten a DNA swab from."
I have some questions about Libby filming the video. Did she think BG was strange but not dangerous? Why not 911? Did daylight give them a false sense of security? If BG did see her recording him, Libby could've been on FaceTime or Facebook live-wouldn't BG hesitate? Maybe BG did enter the Southend and turn around quickly. Maybe Libby really was filming Abby and BG just entered the shot. Thoughts?
Hi Try2solve,
JMO, but I think Libby tried to hide the fact she was videoing him. One report from local Delphi news last summer mentioned the video was taken on her selfie camera (but I can’t find the link). If this was the case, and she was filming over her shoulder, possibly trying to hide the camera from BG’s field of view while doing it, he may not have had any idea she was filming until the video stills and audio were released.
JMO.
Imo it's possible.Hi, terpstra,
This could explain the repeated requests from LE for that one person to step forward with information.
JMO.
I was reading over some old FB postings from the afternoon on the 13th when the girls went missing. The family was asking people to keep a lookout etc. The eerie thing was a friend of the girls had left a comment that she left an hour before the girls arrived. I guess it was a place the young kids hung out.
What if things went wrong and he had to flee without being able to retrieve the bag? Your scenario sounds very risky to me.
seriously? that is so creepy, Im assuming LE knows this and has spoken with this girl to see if she saw anything, maybe she is one of the people that saw BG. weird. MOO
I can’t imagine how the adults, teens and children who we on the trail that horrendous day must feel.
Then he waits a few days for things to calm down, and goes and gets it. Where the crime took place is secluded and on private
land, no one would be disturbing it there.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
How active are the trails? I'm not in a rural area and once in a blue moon find a place to hike unless I just go to the beach, which is always packed with people. So, is this where people go to hang out, have picnics, etc?
They're fairly active. I've never been out there and not run into anyone. That's actually one of the reasons why I DON'T believe that BG knew school wasn't in session that day. On the week days, the park is much busier in the later afternoon (ie, after 3pm). It's not as busy while the kids are in school on the weekdays. I think he thought school was in session and that's why he was there at that time. (Still some people there, but not as crowded so less likely for anyone to see him.)