SewingDeb said:I didn't realize he didn't attend the vigil. Interesting that he took a trip with his ex-wife.
I highly suspect what you have said. I wonder if the police have looked into this angle.Mel1024 said:That really bugs me. maybe stepmom wanted to call authories and he just snapped. IDK just odd Blake had more done than step mom who would target a child
cover up that they were murder by an inturder
Maybe the boy was simply trying to protect his Mom ?JerseyGirl said:I'm having a hard time understanding why Chynna was stabbed while Blake was stabbed, beaten, and strangled. It's almost as if HE was the focus of the killer's rage. I'm sorry to say that with all of the information we've heard in recent years about pedophiles, I can't help but wonder if there was a sexual motive directed towards the boy. Something posted earlier in this thread said something along the lines of only the murderer and LE know what happened there that afternoon. That implies that something happened there other than murder.
That certainly could be but it would seem to me that one fierce swipe could get a ten year-old out of the way. Seems like overkill to me. In the overkill, I can agree that it looks like someone that knew Blake. Yet I still wonder if Blake might have been the target of a pedophile. It's been so long since I've read through this thread - did Chynna usually work? Why were they both home that day? I can't even remember anymore what time the crime is believed to have happened. :doh:raisincharlie said:Maybe the boy was simply trying to protect his Mom ?
I am pointing back to my old post because that statement by police still has me curious. All of us know that murder happened there that day. So what is it that happened that only police and the murderer know?JerseyGirl said:I'm sorry to say that with all of the information we've heard in recent years about pedophiles, I can't help but wonder if there was a sexual motive directed towards the boy. Something posted earlier in this thread said something along the lines of only the murderer and LE know what happened there that afternoon. That implies that something happened there other than murder.
I wonder how it's going with that great and vital evidence. I hope it's been looked at by now.cathieq said:Police: `Promising' info in Franklin slayings
http://tinyurl.com/osk23
Franklin Police Chief John Borges said today that investigators have recovered great and vital evidence in the homicides of a woman and her stepson...
I just found the article that contains the statement that has piqued my interest. I am putting it into a reply to your post because of this comment:raisincharlie said:Maybe the boy was simply trying to protect his Mom ?
That is so very true. It's sometimes impossible to know exacty what's true and what's not within those statements from LE. I would think that they can't say anything untrue because you wouldn't want defense atties to latch onto those statements in trial. But the wording can be so cryptic that it's almost as interesting to decipher those statements as it is to look at the clues left behind at a crime scene.raisincharlie said:Lots of times I find police statements enigmatic enough to make me nutty. I know they have to be very careful in what they can say. Sometimes I also think they say things to create a diversion.
I agree.JerseyGirl said:Looking at other statements within the article -
<snip>
It sounds to me as if huge amounts of evidence were discovered, and I'm leaning towards some of that "vital" evidence being DNA. For now, I truly believe that the husband did not do this and that what the police were hoping for when making that statement was that the DNA would match someone in the database. That's also what I believe was meant by there being no guarantee - that they know that they have enough to nail the perp but that they have to hope to find him or her first. JMO.
Yes that does make senseraisincharlie said:I agree.
I read that Blake was the only child of both the mother and the father. Also, since his wife was also murdered, in my opinion, maybe it would be only natural for both of them to want to fall back on eachother for some support seeing how both of them know what eachother's going through??? IDK...this is just so sad.graciejones said:An other twist to this case is the father did not attend the vigil for his son. However, about 2-3 weeks later the father and his exwife took a trip to Tennessee and on to North Carolina where they lived at the time they were married. How soon we forget and move on. This case is going to be interesting. May take a long time to find out the truth.
Is the biological mother remarried?fozzybear said:I read that Blake was the only child of both the mother and the father. Also, since his wife was also murdered, in my opinion, maybe it would be only natural for both of them to want to fall back on eachother for some support seeing how both of them know what eachother's going through???
It most certainly could be the father/husband. Unfortunately, we've all learned that it isn't over 'til it's over and no matter how innocent or guilty someone seems, it isn't always as it appears.Mel1024 said:Yes that does make sense
but i just can't seem to let go of my thought don't know why i guess because as with other certain crimes it happens a lot also
True I should be more open minded after the groene case that was a pedophile at ramdom with lots of voilence so this very well could be the same thingJerseyGirl said:It most certainly could be the father/husband. Unfortunately, we've all learned that it isn't over 'til it's over and no matter how innocent or guilty someone seems, it isn't always as it appears.
My opinion (for the moment) is based solely on the language used by LE, especially the word vital. That's quite a powerful word. But as was pointed out earlier, it could even be that that was said just to make the perp squirm.