CHERIE.T
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2012
- Messages
- 8,281
- Reaction score
- 33
At the same time I can and can't wait to find out exactly what the pictures encompass because I am curious....though I just can't imagine someone doing such a thing.And not to get too graphic, but I think it's possible TM could've snapped quick pics and sent them without editing on December 17th and 18th (Not saying she did, just that I think the editing issue could've been worked around). She could've taken a pic of SM's "TAMMY" tattoo from a POV angle while showing very little of her own anatomy. It could've still been graphic enough to define the act and specifically that it was being performed by SM, which would've been the main point, I think.
LE stated "positions" plural in one of the statements and I've never heard/ seen anything official using the word "sex" in reference to both encounters. This leads me to believe these were different types of encounters.
I think a similarly angled photo could've been taken showing SM's face without revealing much of TM. Graphic enough to reveal the act being performed without too much exposure for TM.
For me, the only relevance of the specifics pertains to the editing issue- whether TM could've gotten around the vanity issue and sent pics of encounters from that very evening, whether that would've been communicated or implied to Heather, and how that might've affected Heather's thought process on December 18th.
SM could've still claimed ignorance to Heather about the pornographic texts. He could've claimed the pictures were old and TM sent them in anger over his leaving.
I'm just not understanding how sending pictures of this nature was part of any plot to convince Heather that SM was leaving TM. If they weren't part of a plot, does that mean the premeditation didn't begin in earnest until sometime after the 1:35am call?
Lots of married people have affairs but those affairs don't lead to the kind of character assignation TM cast upon Heather followed by kidnapping and murder.