Whiteorchids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2012
- Messages
- 6,953
- Reaction score
- 18,747
I know what CA stands for but what about FCA? TIA
I know what CA stands for but what about FCA? TIA
Yep... And all these people who tune in because they think they will finally hear the truth (haha!) will be disappointed when they get nada... My guess is if there's any questions about the actual crime, it will be short and sweet (and scripted) and fca will give a kind of, sort of, answer and then the rest will be about her life now, and how she's been dealing with all the really mean people who listened to the media and prejudged her... :sick::sick::sick:
And maybe a few jabs at the folks..... And jbaez.
All jmo.
what makes you think she will tell the truth now? She had the opportunity to tell the truth at her trial, at the police station, with her parents.... she didn't. in fact she never has. Her interview would be worthless. Duct tape, Google searches, not reporting her daughter missing EVER. She has no other choice but to lie because there is no other way to explain her behavior. It is consistent with the actions of a murderer. Pretty simple when you think about it.
It just seems odd that a photographer was there to capture FCA's arrival in NY, but no one has spotted her on return flight with her tail between her legs. Could she still be shopping her story around on someone else's coat tails?
what makes you think she will tell the truth now? She had the opportunity to tell the truth at her trial, at the police station, with her parents.... she didn't. in fact she never has. Her interview would be worthless. Duct tape, Google searches, not reporting her daughter missing EVER. She has no other choice but to lie because there is no other way to explain her behavior. It is consistent with the actions of a murderer. Pretty simple when you think about it.
I think the title of this thread should be changed from 'Is it finally happening this time' to 'Is it actually happening this time'. 'Finally' implies that people have been waiting for her to give an interview, which is not the case because most people know it will be nothing more than a lie-filled, softball-question, pity party for FCA. I think her team of enablers tried dipping their toe in the water with all these convenient 'photo ops' to see how the public responds to FCA. However, the response is still overwhelmingly negative and the network(s) realized that she is simply not worth the money she is asking for when compared to the ad revenue she will generate. I have a feeling that good old greed got the best of her again. She most likely expected to be paid the exact same amount of money (or even more :facepalm that was being tossed around years ago. It all boils down to the ability of the interview to generate ad revenue for the network. She is really old news and just not worth it anymore, despite her greedy protestations to the contrary. :moo:The only I know for sure about this girl is that she really believes she's entitled to millions for murdering Caylee, and it won't matter how many times someone tells her no, she'll be shopping that "story" around til she's wrinkled up and gray... The idea was planted in her head, and she's convinced herself that it's owed to her... She's relentless... She should just be grateful for her freedom.
If NBC, or whoever she's shopping her story to, wanted to bring in ratings, they should run a story of why they turned down casey anthony, and tell the world what she's really trying to do, and what she's demanding in order to make money off the death of her baby... I'd watch that...
All jmo.
I've considered the scenario that while FCA was selfishly online/texting/sleeping that she either forgot Caylee in her car or Caylee drowned in the pool. However, when the foolproof suffocation searches came to light there was no question that FCA did this simply because she was an incredibly selfish, lazy, person that was tired of being a mother to a toddler. She could no longer leave Caylee in a crib/playpen/car seat while she did whatever she wanted. Her family and friends got tired of FCA constantly leaving Caylee with them so she could 'work', and she was running out of other people she could trick into babysitting for free (Cindy being one). Her new boyfriend did not want FCA bringing Caylee to his apartment. She wanted her freedom and part of that freedom included being away from Cindy. Once Caylee came along, Cindy was always going to be controlling FCA's life in life some way or another. You take Caylee out of the equation and there is no more Cindy telling FCA what to do anymore. It certainly worked out that way in the end, didn't it? :moo:IT could be the truth is that Caylee Drowned and she covered it up. It could be that she never meant for Caylee to die. It could be lots of things.. the problem is that she lies like she breathes and so there is no way to tell when the truth surfaces.
I don't believe she meant to kill Caylee but I think she caused her death or was responsible for her death in some way.
I would watch the interview. I would like to see where she is mentally.
I find people like this fascinating to watch.
IT could be the truth is that Caylee Drowned and she covered it up. It could be that she never meant for Caylee to die. It could be lots of things.. the problem is that she lies like she breathes and so there is no way to tell when the truth surfaces.
I don't believe she meant to kill Caylee but I think she caused her death or was responsible for her death in some way.
I would watch the interview. I would like to see where she is mentally.
I find people like this fascinating to watch.
I've considered the scenario that while FCA was selfishly online/texting/sleeping that she either forgot Caylee in her car or Caylee drowned in the pool. However, when the foolproof suffocation searches came to light there was no question that FCA did this simply because she was an incredibly selfish, lazy, person that was tired of being a mother to a toddler. She could no longer leave Caylee in a crib/playpen/car seat while she did whatever she wanted. Her family and friends got tired of FCA constantly leaving Caylee with them so she could 'work', and she was running out of other people she could trick into babysitting for free (Cindy being one). Her new boyfriend did not want FCA bringing Caylee to his apartment. She wanted her freedom and part of that freedom included being away from Cindy. Once Caylee came along, Cindy was always going to be controlling FCA's life in life some way or another. You take Caylee out of the equation and there is no more Cindy telling FCA what to do anymore. It certainly worked out that way in the end, didn't it? :moo:
Just curious, if she's innocent, who put Caylee in fca's trunk? And then took her out of it and put her in the swamp? I'm not being snarky - no one ever answers that, even jbaez dodges it... But, if you have a theory, can you explain how it happened when there's proof fca, and only fca, had possession of her car throughout all the days in question? That's undisputed. She's the one who dumped the car when the smell became too much. Just a few days prior, she even confessed to the smell and tried to blame it on a squirrel. The smell was also detected by a cadaver dog and handler, the fbi, all police/investigators who were in the vicinity of the trunk, the crime scene investigator, a tow yard operator, and several others... So, the facts put Caylee, deceased, in the trunk, with fca behind the wheel. Why? If she's innocent, why did she do that? And, since we know fca had possession of the body, how did Caylee get put in the swamp?
The answer to these questions is really just about getting down to the basics of the crime, yet, seem to be seldom answered, or just skipped entirely in theories of her innocence...
All jmo.
Should have said I guess, that I am one of the few who believe Casey didn't do it. I have my own idears about who did.
Agreed. There was tons of forensic and circumstantial evidence pointing to only FCA. Some people just don't understand science. :facepalm:Okay ..... Don't understand how you see it that way but your opinion
When did they ever prove that Caylee was in the trunk? Where's the proof that Casey and only Casey was in possession of that car for the 31 days? George, Lee, Cindy, Jesse G. and possibly the ggrandparents also had keys to that car. I never saw a single piece of evidence that looked like solid evidence. Not 1.. I wasn't here on websleuths during this ordeal, but I followed it as best I could, and have recently been going back over everything. And I still fail to find anything that could have positively put it on Casey.
JMO..
When did they ever prove that Caylee was in the trunk? Where's the proof that Casey and only Casey was in possession of that car for the 31 days? George, Lee, Cindy, Jesse G. and possibly the ggrandparents also had keys to that car. I never saw a single piece of evidence that looked like solid evidence. Not 1.. I wasn't here on websleuths during this ordeal, but I followed it as best I could, and have recently been going back over everything. And I still fail to find anything that could have positively put it on Casey.
JMO..