BBM, That means they were aware what was going on and let it happen, To me. That is how I read it. But I will go with you here..
I suspect one or both suspected or knew that JBR was being molested. I believe that the indictment indicates that they could have and should have done more to intervene. ??? A GJ hearing testimony and seeing evidence is not important? Proof is not presented. Evidence is presented and jurors decide if it is to be considered proof. Imo the R's deserved their day in court to defend against charges stemming from these indictments. The problem was the case was a huge loser for AH. Each defendant would capitalize on the fact that the are not the sole possible perpetrator and it would be impossible to meet the reasonable doubt threshold.
People are convicted everyday without smoking gun evidence.This of course is false.
Agreed
BBM, Not that in general it is not important but since there was never an indictment and trial, I have always felt it was irrelevant. Now knowing what it said, I feel that way even more. Those Jurors saw it ALL. Everything. And yet they could not find real guilt of a murder.
I think the R's deserved their chance in court if there was enough to charge them, but there wasn't. I believe that AH knew this and that is why he left the indictment to rot.
I don't understand this "People are convicted everyday without smoking gun evidence.This of course is false. "
I believe people are convicted of crimes on crappy evidence and they are innocent. I believe that happens way more than it should.