Okay, we'll take out the word "proven" then. He said he did all of that to JonBenet and ... what's that? Oh right, he was cleared in the murder because they had nothing on him. He didn't kill her, didn't make love to her, didn't kiss her butt, wasn't anywhere near Boulder that night. But let's quickly take him on his word that he thinks an eight-year old seduced him. The six-year old's "sex" drove him crazy - did he DO anything about it? Did he rape her? Did he touch her sexually? No, he's just rambling about his fantasies. You can't take one thing that has been proven (i.e. he didn't kill Jonbenet) toss it out and point to other things as truth.
He needs help, that much is true.
The marriage to a 13 year old is abnormal, but where were her parents to stop this? Did he drag her into the marriage? Because I have a hard time believing she didn't have any choice but to marry him. After all, she's not exactly a child, she's a teen. Her parents could've stopped it. She could've stopped it.
That's another story in itself because a thirteen year old is much more developed than a six year old. Maybe he wanted control? But there are many men out there that want to control women, and it doesn't make them pedophiles.
Unfortunately, thoughts and fantasies cannot be controlled and we can't throw people into prison for having thoughts. Again, that was what I was saying when I originally responded to the post.
To be honest I'm more afraid of the men who are registered sex offenders than men like John Karr who seem to stay on the passive side. When he faces the charges in California and becomes a registered sex offender, I'll include him in that group.