It was a rental, of course there's going to be other folks DNA in the house. Probably quite a few, especially since they had just moved in.
I think what someone was referring to- there was a news article in the very beginning stating that Lucas' DNA was not found in the house. Many of us saw this and discussed here and elsewhere. That's why it puzzled many folks, and it caused many of us, myself included, to believe that he had disappeared before Friday night or Saturday morning. It's still causing a lot of folks to think that the landlord had the wrong day, even though both you and FindLucasAllen have confirmed this several times. To my knowledge, there was never a correction by LE or that news site about the lack of Lucas' DNA in the house. I hope this clears up where some of these posts are coming from.
I think you might be referring to media articles that were written a little unclearly, saying that the dogs hadn't found Lucas and Lucas hadn't been found either inside the house or outside the house. That made people think that the dogs hadn't found a scent of Lucas ever having been in the house. But I think what was meant was that neither the dogs sniffing outside, nor the human LE searchers searching inside the house and garden had actually found *Lucas* (not referring to his scent or DNA but the actual Lucas).
I believe they take something that smells of the missing person and present it to the dog at the nearest place where the person was last sighted, and if that was inside a house they present it to the dog on the doorstep outside the door that was reportedly left open, for example. I don't think they try and trace the person's movements within the house with a sniffer dog. A cadaver dog would be used inside if there's suspicion that a person may not have left the house alive, but LE have never clarified, to my knowledge, whether cadaver dogs were taken into the house.