I agree with your very first point--Houze's reputation.
The powers that be, excluding law enforcement, didn't have the courage to take him on. They let the pursuit of justice for a 7-year-old child slip away as they hid behind something they dubbed "the Casey Anthony effect." They chose the option that was in their own best interests.
I don't mean to imply that I think taking on Houze and achieving a guilty verdict would have been a cake walk. Quite to the contrary, actually.
But I think about this: she is alive and free today and able to torment Kyron's mother; a not guilty verdict wouldn't have changed that. We don't know where Kyron is or what happened to him; and a not guilty verdict wouldn't have changed that either.
How many of us believe Casey Anthony is innocent because the jury found her not guilty?
I think Desiree was really concerned because of the "double jeopardy" clause and believes that if they find Kyron's remains charges will finally be brought against her.
I'm not so sure about that now. After so many years, witnesses' memories fade; they become less reliable on the stand.
And Houze will still be her atty.
It could be like Hailey Dunn's case. We'll just keep waiting and waiting.
I know this comment is so negative that I should be ashamed of myself, but I've been around a long time now. I'm disgusted.
Maybe I'll change my mind tomorrow because someone takes their time to write a wonderful, positive comment in rebuttal.