Agreed and imo;
LA has EVERY right to have legal representation, although I'm unclear as to when he actually retained an attorney. I'm under the impression that he did so fairly recently and if that's true, imo, he should have gotten one some time ago, but again, jmo.
I've never understood the whole discussion around & fascination with the LA/possible biological father of Caylee theory. I've stayed away from making any speculations on that subject because
a.) I felt that should/would be left up to the dna expert's who may (or may not) have just happened upon that information without actually having set out to find it and, in that case, would disclose it to the appropriate person(s) that they deemed necessary (sorry/spelling - ?) in this investigation.
b.) I felt that any discussion around that sort of speculatation was extremely harmful upon an inidvidual's reputation (in this case, LA) should this prove to be untrue. I don't support all of LA's actions over the past 5 + months BUT I also don't buy into everything that is thrown out there about him because of that.
c.) furthermore, from everything that I know regarding CSA and the criteria for perp vs. victim, one of the criteria is a 5 year age difference between the two with the perp obviously being older then the victim.
Now I know from reading your posts that you are extremely knowledgable in a wide assortment of areas so you probably know far better than me on this,
but if that criteria is correct I don't believe that there is a 5 year age difference between LA & KCA...?
(I do love reading your posts! even when I may not completely agree with your opinion).....