I think another poster wrote about this, and if so I agree-The list of evidence that ties KC to the crime scene is the list of each of the tiny little bones that made up Caylee Marie Anthony.
If KC cannot prove (and while she does not have the burden of proving her non-guilt, she does have to defend her daughter's whereabouts) that someone took Caylee from her, then it stands to reason that she, the parent, would have been the last to have had physical possession of the sweet angel whose bones were in that swampy ditch.[/QUOTE]
BBM
ITA, Just Jayla! This one, simple statement is probably, IMO, the biggest problem that JB has to deal with, after the "31 days" of course! No matter how many people JB tries to point the finger at, smear and malign in the media, call them suspects or liars, or any of the other litany of ways to commit jury tampering he continues to do, he cannot get away from KC's sworn statement. She swears she left her child at Sawgrass Apartments with ZFG. Period. He is going to have to produce ZFG or some evidense that she ever existed. If he can't, then KC put that baby in a trashbag, dumped her on the side of the road, and went on her merry way.