UKGuy,
Burke graduated in 2009.
He lives and works alone
Even after his media appearance in 2016, Burke continues to keep things private. He is employed as a software engineer, choosing to work out of his home so as to avoid being around other people in an office. This is long before COVID-19.
Both parents received indictment’s for child abuse. Placed in a situation that resulted is JB death which count VI accounts for. Although count VII states knowing the person being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of murder in the first degree and child abuse resulting in death. Is this what you mean in reference to conspiracy and if so; isn’t this also punishable in a court of law? It is my understanding that the jury couldn’t decide who did what so that is why they didn’t follow up with the indictment. Seems to be if they came to these conclusions and handed down these indictments they should have been held accountable for something.
Since you obviously understand the workings in the court of law would you be so kind as to break it down as to (whom feel did what) based on what you know?
I guess the forensic evidence would be prior that PR wished to avoid.
So, they just walked with felony indictments? How does the ordinary Joe do that?
Rain on my Parade,
Without sight of the original indictments being exact is not possible.
There are five scenarios:
1. BDI - No parental input.
2. BDI - Parental input.
3. JDI - Solo
4. PDI - Solo
5. PDI + JDI - Both parents involved.
1. Means nobody goes to court because nothing is filed as BR is beneath the age of responsibility.
2. Means both parents charged with multiple Counts of Murder in the First Degree.
3. Means JR alone is charged with multiple Counts of Murder in the First Degree.
4. Means PR alone is charged with multiple Counts of Murder in the First Degree.
5. Means both parents charged with multiple Counts of Murder in the First Degree.
2. & 5. represent a conspiracy.
Murder in the First Degree is the prominent indictment and based on the evidence publicly available it appears Patsy asphyxiated JonBenet, naturally this is speculation, i.e. that's a legal rider.
All the other charges are derivative and secondary in legal force.
So in legal , technical terms the case is PDI.
So although we can speculate that the case might be PDI is it scenario 2. or 4. your choice will depend on who consider the
person to be?
I prefer scenario 2. it explains more.
Scenario 5. is possible given the assumed Counts the Grand Jury returned against both parents.
Speculating here is an outline scenario:
Burke whacks JonBenet accidentally leaving her in a coma, after redressing her in his longjohns and Patsy's niece's size-12 Bloomingdales, he stages her asleep in bed.
Patsy awakens to find JonBenet unresponsive in her bed, the rest is all staging either by Patsy alone or assisted by John?
.