eve carson
Verified Family - Joan Webster
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2006
- Messages
- 540
- Reaction score
- 717
Hi Sweetluv,
My concerns about this incident have come over time and with more and more evidence to fill in the pieces.
Joan travelled alone. Only a very few people can be verified to know where Joan would be. Authorities were involved in interviews at Logan the 1st week of December 1981, including Jack McEwen. That is verified in police records. George and Eleanor were also up in Boston at that time.
Joan was very familiar with Logan. I know from many reports that Joan had collected her suitcase. She would not be reporting missing luggage. She would not need to ask about ground transportation or even where the bathroom was. The person behind the counter would have had to have been someone credentialled to be behind a counter. That would narrow it to an employee, security or law enforcement.
Joan was not reported missing until very late at night on December 1, 1981. The article appeared in the Newark Star Ledger on December 5, 1981. The individual who saw her talking to a man behind the counter was identified. It did not make the news in Boston. Reports began appearing in Boston after Joan's purse and wallet were recovered on December 2, 1981. The first person contacted about Joan's wallet was George Webster, not the police.
The Websters sent news clippings almost every day. This was never among them. I knew nothing about this until I started digging into Joan's case. That is very upsetting to me. First, Joan had just been reported missing. Loving parents would be all over any possible lead. Second, Jack McEwen, the ITT liaison with George Webster, dismissed it and the lead was suppressed. Again, this is all documented in police reports.
Then the police hand delivered the eyewitness lead and composite to Eleanor Webster. This lead was suppressed by the authorities and the Websters. Again, I knew nothing about the cabbie lead and composite until I started to recover documents. All of this was in December 1981 in the first critical days for a missing person.
Knowing all that I know now, I believe this was related to Joan's disappearance. Why hide these facts otherwise? Using some deductive reasoning, the man behind the counter might have been letting Joan know someone was going to meet up with her. What happened next, Joan went out and engaged the cab, her suitcase was loaded in the trunk, The man catches up with her, but she does not seem surprised. She announces the man is with her. The man gets into a verbal exchange with the cabbie, probably a ruse. He then turns to Joan and says "we" don't want to take this cab, and maneuvers Joan to the blue car. Joan disappeared.
The man that met up with Joan in the cab line is the person responsible for her disappearance and murder. He did not act alone. Someone was driving the blue car and knew to be there. The man behind the counter is possibly a third individual involved.
My concerns about this incident have come over time and with more and more evidence to fill in the pieces.
Joan travelled alone. Only a very few people can be verified to know where Joan would be. Authorities were involved in interviews at Logan the 1st week of December 1981, including Jack McEwen. That is verified in police records. George and Eleanor were also up in Boston at that time.
Joan was very familiar with Logan. I know from many reports that Joan had collected her suitcase. She would not be reporting missing luggage. She would not need to ask about ground transportation or even where the bathroom was. The person behind the counter would have had to have been someone credentialled to be behind a counter. That would narrow it to an employee, security or law enforcement.
Joan was not reported missing until very late at night on December 1, 1981. The article appeared in the Newark Star Ledger on December 5, 1981. The individual who saw her talking to a man behind the counter was identified. It did not make the news in Boston. Reports began appearing in Boston after Joan's purse and wallet were recovered on December 2, 1981. The first person contacted about Joan's wallet was George Webster, not the police.
The Websters sent news clippings almost every day. This was never among them. I knew nothing about this until I started digging into Joan's case. That is very upsetting to me. First, Joan had just been reported missing. Loving parents would be all over any possible lead. Second, Jack McEwen, the ITT liaison with George Webster, dismissed it and the lead was suppressed. Again, this is all documented in police reports.
Then the police hand delivered the eyewitness lead and composite to Eleanor Webster. This lead was suppressed by the authorities and the Websters. Again, I knew nothing about the cabbie lead and composite until I started to recover documents. All of this was in December 1981 in the first critical days for a missing person.
Knowing all that I know now, I believe this was related to Joan's disappearance. Why hide these facts otherwise? Using some deductive reasoning, the man behind the counter might have been letting Joan know someone was going to meet up with her. What happened next, Joan went out and engaged the cab, her suitcase was loaded in the trunk, The man catches up with her, but she does not seem surprised. She announces the man is with her. The man gets into a verbal exchange with the cabbie, probably a ruse. He then turns to Joan and says "we" don't want to take this cab, and maneuvers Joan to the blue car. Joan disappeared.
The man that met up with Joan in the cab line is the person responsible for her disappearance and murder. He did not act alone. Someone was driving the blue car and knew to be there. The man behind the counter is possibly a third individual involved.