You do realise no one analysed the arm wounds for dog dna or took swabs for that purpose? Or compared the wounds with, Idk. molds or something(?) of Chloe's teeth and claws right? Because of Proctor's tunnel vision right? Moo
Jackson will certainly be asking the ME/autopsy person why she never took swabs of the bite and scratch like wounds for sending off to the dna animal specialist. Or if it turns out she did take swabs, then the jury can wonder why LE did not have them analysed by the animal dna specialist. Jackson will also no doubt shed some light on why the ME did not ask or was not requested by LE to compare Chloe's bite and or teeth and Chloe's claws with the wounds. moo
As for hair on the shirt. I don't recall lab techs even looking for any because tunnel vision, notwithstanding the numerous contamination instances JO's clothing was subjected to (ambulance and hospital floor for eg, exposure on lawn, exposure to others during resuscitation efforts, moving JO from lawn to ambulance etc etc). Also I do not recall testimony by lab or anyone else about general propensity for shedding of a german shepherd in winter (when they need their coat yes?) and how much hair transfer might be expected during an episdoe of scratching and possible biting. Do you? No, because there wasn't any cos tunnel vision of Proctor. Moo