SuperdadV8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2020
- Messages
- 2,406
- Reaction score
- 11,352
If it has been a planned burglary, something else should have been missing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter through the patio door -even though not locked- you would still need a key.....
Somehow I believe CB entered through the window by lifting the shutters. The same happened to my parents once many years ago. It's simple routine for an experienced burglar.
Once inside he would be able to choose his exit: back through the window or through the unlocked door.
I think HCW meant that MM died soon after her abduction. In other words, CB took her while alive, abused her somewhere else and so on.Has she been still alive when GM checked at 9.05 pm? A theory, that could fit PJ's assumptions IMO, so plausible!
HCW stated, he thinks MM died soon in Portugal....
Molesting gone wrong and removing evidence?!
The sliding doors to the pool were unlocked and could be entered and exited without keys.Yes, but i read, the (wooden?) door had been locked, but the patio doors hadn't, confirmed by the MC's...
Why do you need a key?
a small detail: the scheduled flights home were on the 5th.That's my opinion too. There are some clues (if confirmed), that lead to a planned abduction.
- nothing missing except MM
- horrible job to change a life
- moving to germany in some way
- changing jag registration
- last day of MC's vacation
- NOT a single forensic trace, like in the JC and IG cases
If it has been a planned burglary, something else should have been missing.
PJ appear to be remarkably coy on the subject - but this would appear to confirm they have an active co-operation / liaison on CB
Also it implies that the Met have been focussed on different suspects until now
Worth mentioning HCW appeared to criticize PJ in his public comments back in June
Mr Farinha said: 'If the suspicions about this man were so obvious, he would have been the subject of requests made by the British, which were always authorised by Portugal, but those requests about him were never made. He added in his interview with Lusa: 'If the PJ is being accused of giving Brueckner a lack of priority, the same could be said of the Metropolitan Police.
'In theory everything could have been different but in 2007 and in 2012 we didn't known what we knew in 2017.'
He also described this week's fresh appeal as an initiative of the German police, who were 'convinced it could lead to additional information coming in from the Germany community.'
But appearing to hint that the evidence the three police forces have at the moment may not be enough to bring charges and a successful prosecution, he was quoted as saying: 'Suspicions about the German national have grown but unfortunately they are not enough to make him an arguido and formally accuse him.'
The interview ABC carried with the unnamed PJ officer was written by the paper's Lisbon correspondent.
German 'prime suspect' in Maddie McCann case Christian Brueckner is INNOCENT, says Portuguese police | Daily Mail Online
I think there may be confusion here relating to what you are terming the 'patio door'. The patio doors are the sliding doors that face the pool side of the building. These were unlocked and can be opened from outside. The door that faces onto the car park is the front door. It too was unlocked but can only be opened from the outside with a key.The sliding doors to the pool were unlocked and could be entered and exited without keys.
The patio door = door to parking lot was also not locked, but by closing it, it would fall in its lock. From the outside you would need a key to open it. From the inside you could open it without a key (unless it would have been locked with a key).
To enter through the patio door -even though not locked- you would still need a key.....
Somehow I believe CB entered through the window by lifting the shutters. The same happened to my parents once many years ago. It's simple routine for an experienced burglar.
Once inside he would be able to choose his exit: back through the window or through the unlocked door.
I thought it might be helpful to summarise the on the record statements made by CB's defence lawyer FF which appear to summarise how he intends to present a defence. He has spoken in both english and german media, but the Sun article below captures the main thrust of the various articles
I think there are three strategies he is working on, to raise reasonable doubt. Depending on what evidence HCW has, I will expect FF to run all of these.
1. Abduction by CB doesn't fit the timeline - (the 90 second window claim)
2. Competing theories by rival police forces
3. Existence of other suspects who can't be ruled out.
Maddie suspect’s lawyer demands cops reveal ‘concrete evidence’ of murder
Clearly we want to be able to discuss FF's strategy in a robust but respectful way.
Even with the contamination of that crime scene, surely that scenario would have left at least some useful forensic evidence, some evidence of a struggle and enough noise to wake and distress the twins who were still fast asleep at 22.00. And why do that when quicker and easier to just grab MM.I was trying not to be graphic but a few people seem to have misunderstood what I was getting at. I am saying what if his initial intent was to rob but then after seeing MM, he tried to do something else. I don't really want to go into the scenarios of what might have transpired but below are some articles of what we know about CB's tendencies. I'm just saying I can imagine more than one scenario where trying to silence the child could have felt like a better option that simply running away. Or where by running away, he would have been leaving incriminating evidence at ths scene. I'll leave it at that.
Christian Brueckner 'joked about performing sex act while girls slept'
Die Akte Christian B. - DER SPIEGEL - Panorama
Mum claims Maddie suspect Christian Brueckner 'exposed himself' to her daughter
ETA: not saying this is what I think happened, just that I think it is plausible as a possibility. There are some aspects to it that make more sense than the planned abduction angle.
That's helpful. Thanks mrjitty. However, I am unsure about the 'competing theories by rival police forces' bit. As far as i understand, GA has been dismissed from the police force due to his theories and his absolutely devastating involvement in the MM case(and other cases) . Is the conspiracy theories presented in the sm, the theories of the portuguese police force?
That's my opinion too. There are some clues (if confirmed), that lead to a planned abduction.
- nothing missing except MM
- horrible job to change a life
- moving to germany in some way
- changing jag registration
- last day of MC's vacation
- NOT a single forensic trace, like in the JC and IG cases
Not sure it's entirely clear what HCW meant or said altogether, I know he did dispute some of what was reported about it afterwards though. Most of the papers reported it as you say, that he killed her soom after the abduction, but I can't see any direct quote where HCW says that it was after an abduction. What they quote him as saying was:I think HCW meant that MM died soon after her abduction. In other words, CB took her while alive, abused her somewhere else and so on.
I assumed that would be the front door. A normal automatic lock. The sliding doors would be the patio doors wouldn't they? And wouldn't they be consistent with GM being seen by JW coming down the steps?The sliding doors to the pool were unlocked and could be entered and exited without keys.
The patio door = door to parking lot was also not locked, but by closing it, it would fall in its lock. From the outside you would need a key to open it. From the inside you could open it without a key (unless it would have been locked with a key).
Which would have made sense time-wise CBs phone call?IMO one might propose that the optimum time for an intruder to enter the flat was immediately after observing GM and KM setting off together to the restaurant?
I was trying not to be graphic but a few people seem to have misunderstood what I was getting at. I am saying what if his initial intent was to rob but then after seeing MM, he tried to do something else. I don't really want to go into the scenarios of what might have transpired but below are some articles of what we know about CB's tendencies. I'm just saying I can imagine more than one scenario where trying to silence the child could have felt like a better option that simply running away. Or where by running away, he would have been leaving incriminating evidence at ths scene. I'll leave it at that.
Christian Brueckner 'joked about performing sex act while girls slept'
Die Akte Christian B. - DER SPIEGEL - Panorama
Mum claims Maddie suspect Christian Brueckner 'exposed himself' to her daughter
ETA: not saying this is what I think happened, just that I think it is plausible as a possibility. There are some aspects to it that make more sense than the planned abduction angle.
Interesting analysis.Not sure it's entirely clear what HCW meant or said altogether, I know he did dispute some of what was reported about it afterwards though. Most of the papers reported it as you say, that he killed her soom after the abduction, but I can't see any direct quote where HCW says that it was after an abduction. What they quote him as saying was:
Prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters says he believes Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner "relatively quickly killed the girl, possibly abused her and then killed her"
Madeleine McCann was killed soon after she was kidnapped, says German prosecutor
In that context, it remains open to the possibility of the murder taking place within 5A.
No those doors can only be locked from the inside 100% the front door can be opened when inside without a key but you need a key from the outside to open it to enter into the apartment.To enter through the patio door -even though not locked- you would still need a key.....
Somehow I believe CB entered through the window by lifting the shutters. The same happened to my parents once many years ago. It's simple routine for an experienced burglar.
Once inside he would be able to choose his exit: back through the window or through the unlocked door.
It is interesting they are confident of the death, but the abuse is only listed as a suspicion. One possibility for that is that HB states CB told him both those things happened but BKA have only verified the death part of it by other means, possibly a photo or video. If there is a video, HCWs comment does add further weight to the theory of her dying in 5A. Given CB's previous, he surely would have also filmed the abuse if he was able to, not just evidence of death.Interesting analysis.
BTW HCW sounds like IMO he may be unsure whether the "abused" section even happened. Let's hope it didn't.
My question is: if death-in-apartment is what happened, what would the intruder do next?