Victoria Chambers
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2019
- Messages
- 537
- Reaction score
- 3,475
The thing is, CB is a known burglar who had a cache of stolen goods and various passports up in the rafters that his mates destroyed at his request. Any media footage that LE may now have, CB could say as an alibi that the footage is linked to a device that he had stolen at some point. As opposed to him having shot the footage. Whilst I personally have him guilty as sin at this point, am I prepared to give CB the benefit of any doubt regarding such an alibi?? Giving the amount of paedophiles, rapists, child murderers who were in and around PdL in 2007, there is reasonable doubt! What does intrigue me, is that somebody was able to accurately describe something related to the MM case to LE. - If this is something only the perp could know, then there can be no alibi. And charges ought to be pursued for this alone! Is this on it's own, not evidence? X