Dlk79
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
- Messages
- 1,614
- Reaction score
- 9,984
Fulscher doesn't actually say that CB was in the vicinity of PDL on the 3rd in that article. He talks about walking different routes around the resort and how, in his opinion, CB couldn't have done it without being caught. But he still hasn't explained what he meant by this conclusion. And if he was implying that CB was in/near PDL on the 3rd, it does not stack up with what they are currently saying.But it's not true so why is it even being posited as a possibility that warrants any further discussion on here? Is it just boredom in the absence of progress?
CB's own lawyer, FF, has confirmed that CB was not just in Portugal on the eve of 3rd May 2007 but also in the general vicinity of PdL. Can we not just take that as a given? Here, in FF's own words -
In his letter to MWT, CB states that he never returned to PDL after 2006. He also states he can't recall if he was with his 'fling' on the 3rd or not. Which, by extension, seems to imply that he cannot state with certainty where he was on that date.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's actually his alibi should it get to court. He may just give a list of places he "might have been" because he apparently "can't remember" exactly what he did each day. Some nights he was with his fling, some nights in Foral, some in Tomar, some in Barranco, maybe a few drug runs to Spain or Germany thrown in for good measure.
As C Greek said though, this is the first time we've heard what account CB allegedly told police back in 2013. That's why it is of interest. Whether the CNN report is accurate or not is yet to be seen. But it would be a significant piece of evidence against CB if the BKA have witnesses or other evidence that place him in Portugal during the time period he claimed to have been in a different country.