Even better! He has access to a wide range of evidence against him!It's 5,500 pages according to CB's latest letter.
Even better! He has access to a wide range of evidence against him!It's 5,500 pages according to CB's latest letter.
Well his previous letters in the same spirit were written in his native languageWhere did CB get his education to be so versed in English that enables sometimes mere mortals to offer opinions of what his supposed writings and drawings expose, him being being an itinerant .
He admits to having a dictionary in order to write the letter/s.Where did CB get his education to be so versed in English that enables sometimes mere mortals to offer opinions of what his supposed writings and drawings expose, him being being an itinerant .
Do we know they're doing much though? Just because they or the media or the accused himself says their representing him it doesn't necessarily mean they're doing much actual work imoThat's why I said previously his 4 strong team of lawyers would have definitely picked up on anything even remotely abusing his human rights. Who has such a strong team of lawyers!?
they have been finding ways to delay the trial for the other 5 charges, they have been finding ways to give him an alibi, so I guess they have been working on his case. FF would have been the first to pick up on anything relating to human rights concerns. jmoDo we know they're doing much though? Just because they or the media or the accused himself says their representing him it doesn't necessarily mean they're doing much actual work imo
Maybe not so difficult if you actually had done the crime."I'm almost sure that some other persons in my situation would have capitulated long time ago". I reckon he's right about that. I'm sure I'd not survive three years of being accused of child murder.
I'll remind you of this post when it's finally revealed the German state's case against him (re: MM, I don't mean the other charges of course) was shambolic.Maybe not so difficult if you actually had done the crime.
I don’t know why you would feel the need to remind me of this post no matter what the outcome. My point was that if he has committed the crime then being accused of it without being charged is probably easier to bear than being falsely accused of committing such a crime.I'll remind you of this post when it's finally revealed the German state's case against him (re: MM, I don't mean the other charges of course) was shambolic.
Which it may well be as far as any of us know.
Doesn't the almost certainly disastrous decision to search in Portugal last week make you think they may actually have made a complete hash of this? (or been tricked into doing so by having to rely on dodgy information from unreliable sources?)
Credible alibis? Really?!they have been finding ways to delay the trial for the other 5 charges, they have been finding ways to give him an alibi, so I guess they have been working on his case. FF would have been the first to pick up on anything relating to human rights concerns. jmo
credible??? no way credible! but don't you remember the attempts to convince the media by FF that this fling of CB was with CB that week, whereas it appeared it was a week later?Credible alibis? Really?!
I saw what JC said. If the authorities were thinking the same then somebody made a disastrous decision (or were tricked into doing so)I don’t know why you would feel the need to remind me of this post no matter what the outcome. My point was that if he has committed the crime then being accused of it without being charged is probably easier to bear than being falsely accused of committing such a crime.
Nor do I understand why you have come to the conclusion that the decision to search the reservoir in Portugal was “disastrous “. What information have you got about this event that I don’t?
Yes, but that is ridiculous, even amateur since he does not have any substance to support that. Maybe that week? that day?! LOLcredible??? no way credible! but don't you remember the attempts to convince the media by FF that this fling of CB was with CB that week, whereas it appeared it was a week later?
I have no idea what you are talking about and I don’t do initials sorry.I saw what JC said. If the authorities were thinking the same then somebody made a disastrous decision (or were tricked into doing so)
Clarke said they expected to find bodies. (and if this was a different case I'm not sure why they'd be searching if that isn't what they were looking for)I have no idea what you are talking about and I don’t do initials sorry.
And they will never establish a link if they do not bother to look for one. Particularly when they have a known location for the prime suspect.CB can be linked to there, they followed up Intel that Madeleine was also, imo it's that link they need but do not have.
So you’re calling the searches “disastrous” based on hearsay from Jon Clake? Obviously that’s your prerogative but I think I’d prefer to defer judgement until more is known about the reasons for the search and what was (or wasn’t) found.Clarke said they expected to find bodies. (and if this was a different case I'm not sure why they'd be searching if that isn't what they were looking for)
Yes but why consider guilty a possibilityI think this would be usual for when one is picking the petals off a daisy ' he loves me, he loves me not'
I had forgotten the information about the gun being thrown into water. I think it is possible that he didn't give the correct information about where in the interview and did give the correct coordinates to the police.One question, does anyone here know if the dogs actually made a Mark/referral?
And I remember that Seyferth told in an interview where he threw the gun into the water, that was not where the police have now searched.
And in a documentary by Mark Williams Thomas, it was said that Brückner's camera was probably in a car that had been sold to a dealer.
Because by the rules of this fortune telling gsme, you have binary outcomes? So not guilty must have guilty. Maybe he chose the daisy-plucking device because he sees his fate as up to chance.Yes but why consider guilty a possibility
As has been mentioned before when exactly does he require an alibi for ?credible??? no way credible! but don't you remember the attempts to convince the media by FF that this fling of CB was with CB that week, whereas it appeared it was a week later?