> Rather than a description from a disability form, I would think the information would have been taken directly from the parents and would more likely based on her progress and records at school.
For what it's worth, the description still reads as if, and in the full order of the questions on the PIP form which I linked to before.
There's nothing wrong with this and I'm not saying there is.
I can imagine that the family back home could have been looking for any report which helped to describe Nora's difficulties, whether for the media or the police or both, and the PIP report is super important in order to get the best from benefits in the UK.
But it does read exactly as if the questions were asked in the same order as the PIP benefit form and subsequent report, including things like ability to dress herself, brush her hair, cope with money, etc etc.
It's a vital form, both for the sake of getting the benefits and getting a concise third-person report on what someone's worst day with disabilities can be like.
Like I said, there's nothing wrong with this at all. Just trying to give some perspective on how broad this scope of information was with seemingly information that didn't matter to trying to find her, but, at the same time, gives an idea of what she can and can't do - with that personal statement bit of liking cuddling with her mum in the evening being very important and likely added to give her more of a perspective as a person, not just a person with a disability who can't do xyz.