Armchair_Defective
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2017
- Messages
- 654
- Reaction score
- 3,310
I’m sorry, but I’m just not buying this autopsy. I absolutely trust the parents and extended family when they say Nora would not have gone out alone. There is more to this story and I for one hope that they have a second autopsy back home.
Even if Nora had gone outside alone, why would she only be wearing underwear? Would she not have at least enough understanding to know that she’d need to at least put shoes on? I realise she needs help with dressing etc but really? And where are the few clothes she was wearing now?
Also, many are suggesting she would run and hide from rescuers. I fail to see how when she’d be becoming increasingly weak over days of starvation. She’d likely become gradually delirious. Surely someone would have come across her or at least seen signs of her living in the wild over the days of searching - it’s not likely she would be got far.
As much as I’d like to believe nobody else is involved, I just can’t. Either someone lured her or took her into the jungle and lost her, or she was taken and held, only to be released days before she was found. Too coincidental that she’s found by the waterfall she was so desperate to see, a day after the shaman did his bit. AMOO.
However much you trust the parent's opinion about her not venturing outside it's still just an opinion, a belief. They thought they knew her character but it was not an unchangeable fact. That's why the police were treating this both as missing persons and possible abduction. Families don't always know a victim as well as they believe.
As for why Nora didn't put shoes and clothing on? It was pretty warm, much warmer than London has been recently. If Nora couldn't grasp concepts she probably wasn't really planning anything at all, just saw somethings that interested her outside and kept going until she was lost imo.