Yes, Klaas and Mark Lunsford have both spoken on this.
"The Ramseys never had to explain the mention of the $118,000, because why should they have to explain it. They didn't write the ransom note. Ask the person who wrote the ransom note to explain the mention of $118,000."
Okay, Buzz, I get you. Well, I have to disagree FOR NOW, and say that there's just enough evidence that Patsy wrote it, and I certainly don't think John would write his own bonus! So the idea was to make it look like an employee, imo.
"JB is the victim, NOT John. He was never cleared from suspicion."
Still isn't, for those who missed the press conference.
"The family is always looked at first because 75% of the time they are guilty. I heard that statistic on a news magazine last night. I would love to believe that no father would do such things to their daughter, but I'm not naive."
Clint Van Zandt said the same, LinasK. You've got to wonder if John's worried about the defense getting the file!
"His past losses are irrelevant to his guilt, so is Patsy's having cancer. A criminal is still a criminal even if they die of cancer."
Yes, the "infallibility argument" doesn't do it with me.
"The Ramseys never had to explain the mention of the $118,000, because why should they have to explain it. They didn't write the ransom note. Ask the person who wrote the ransom note to explain the mention of $118,000."
Okay, Buzz, I get you. Well, I have to disagree FOR NOW, and say that there's just enough evidence that Patsy wrote it, and I certainly don't think John would write his own bonus! So the idea was to make it look like an employee, imo.
"JB is the victim, NOT John. He was never cleared from suspicion."
Still isn't, for those who missed the press conference.
"The family is always looked at first because 75% of the time they are guilty. I heard that statistic on a news magazine last night. I would love to believe that no father would do such things to their daughter, but I'm not naive."
Clint Van Zandt said the same, LinasK. You've got to wonder if John's worried about the defense getting the file!
"His past losses are irrelevant to his guilt, so is Patsy's having cancer. A criminal is still a criminal even if they die of cancer."
Yes, the "infallibility argument" doesn't do it with me.