makeadifference
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2023
- Messages
- 90
- Reaction score
- 232
Can you say more?Her "being distracted" during the week before murder is telling IMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you say more?Her "being distracted" during the week before murder is telling IMO
The alleged severity of the attack feels personal.
Still ... I am on the fence regarding a random attacker, though !
Omo.
Or, she fought hard. She think she used her physical fitness and motherly instinct to fight as best she could, but her attacker overcame her.The alleged severity of the attack feels personal.
Still ... I am on the fence regarding a random attacker, though
Omo.
Think the only thing that feels random for me is the rock, if that’s true. Whoever did it used whatever they could grab, being a rock.The alleged severity of the attack feels personal.
Still ... I am on the fence regarding a random attacker, though !
Omo.
Not sure if this link holds, but there was a Defendant's Petition to Modify Visitation filed on March 23, 2022 which was DENIED on 12/29/22. Not that it's related at all, just noting ...
What other aspects besides the weapon, don't feel random to you?Think the only thing that feels random for me is the rock, if that’s true. Whoever did it used whatever they could grab, being a rock.
I think so too.I think whoever did it was already at the park/ on the trail/ in the tunnel. Jmo
Definitely could be random, however statistically the odds are higher she knew the person. If the reports are correct that her face was smashed, then it seems more personal in my opinion. Plus I’m in no way judging…..each their own but she did put her self out there on Facebook and now we hear dating sites. This could have been done by anyone that had a fancy for her at the gym, dating site, or it could have been someone the new boyfriend knows, didn’t one article somewhere say he was living in a recovery house? Maybe someone was feeling jealousy of his new found love. Whoever it is, I just feel they knew who she was.What other aspects besides the weapon, don't feel random to you?
Not sure if this link holds, but there was a Defendant's Petition to Modify Visitation filed on March 23, 2022 which was DENIED on 12/29/22. Not that it's related at all, just noting ...
Could be one of the Ex’s didn’t like her life style and wanted the children……so many places to look.This was a permanent order in 2017; was re-opened as an "emergency" motion in 2019 (what happened with Rachel in 2019?); was dismissed and then was re-opened again in 2022 as a petition to modify visitation. This was going on for years and even with a final order in 2017, was still never-ending at the time.
Look at the standard of relief required in order to meet the requirements for an emergency motion:
Standard for Relief
- There must be sufficient showing that there is an imminent risk of harm or harassment to a party or minor child, unless there is sufficient showing that there will be an imminent loss of jurisdiction or removal of the child from the state.
- Purely speculative evidence of harm in insufficient to grant emergency relief.
There is other relief listed by way of another motion but this emergency motion must be grounded on an actual emergency.
jmo
Moo..what would be the reason for her to go into those tunnels?
Those tunnels drain into a creek or something, they don't go anywhere....mooTaking a shortcut from one part of the trail to another?
JMVHO.
Someone dragged her there? According to MG there was a 15-20' blood trail to/from the tunnel. Of course, we don't know if that is factual at this point. MOOMoo..what would be the reason for her to go into those tunnels?