Mica
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2013
- Messages
- 5,069
- Reaction score
- 12,529
Looked to me like home security camera, not a doorbell camera.
I believe I heard the officer refer to it as a home security camera.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looked to me like home security camera, not a doorbell camera.
They don't know who he is, they just know there is a DNA match to the crime in California. But since they haven't solved the crime in California either, they don't have a name.I’m just now getting a chance to see this and I am stunned. This is so not what I was expecting.
This is why LE should not assure the public all is well before they know anything. What a nightmare. A coast to coast random killer.
If someone could clarify what exactly he said about not having a name to go with the DNA. Is it just that there is no name with the DNA in codis or that codis won’t give a name with it.(which would be crazy to me).
edit: typo
It looked like it was doorbell level to me. It wasn't an angle from above. JMOLooked to me like home security camera, not a doorbell camera. It was high up right? That's where my front door one is too. Not concealed either so I bet theirs wasn't.
The guy was brazen. He knew enough to turn away from the camera but didn't care enough to worry about the fact that there were cameras there to start begging the Q -- Did he know the property? Know how many there were and where they were? Did he work at or in the property ever?
Was he one of the installers of the cameras?
So many questions from that little 2 second clip they released.
Just bizarre
I have read young girl. I assume that means someone under the age of 16.Where has this been reported, I haven't seen it. Sad!
Yes true. But the fact he had no tattoos in March is still unusual imo. He's a criminal. It's generally the macho fashion for bad dudes his age, even for not bad guys, and young women. He's not gang affiliated imo. Sure I know a lot of young men who don't have tattoos, but it just seems unlikely (to me) that a creep lowlife like him wouldn't have any.He could have a whole bunch of tattoos by now.
In fact, that might be his next move.
Do I keep saying Maine? Ugh Lol My mistakeIsn't this Bel Air, Maryland? Or am I way off on my state abbreviations?
It looked like it was doorbell level to me. It wasn't an angle from above. JMO
Thanks. That’s what I thought.They don't know who he is, they just know there is a DNA match to the crime in California. But since they haven't solved the crime in California either, they don't have a name.
he might have had some connection to someone in the house-"friend of a friend" sort of thing and then he did this- maybe they thought they had a name but it was fake. why he is now 3000 miles away.... if he is involved in something like smuggling the "people who know him" may not be stepping up to ID him IMO.Observations
This guy, at least in March
1. Was very physically fit
2. Precision haircut
3. No discernible tattoos or other markings
4. Clothes not dirty as if he is homeless
5. Gold chain around his neck
6. Little to no back hair/arm hair
7. Looks like he had $; And, he had the means to travel across country
Why Maryland?
Social Media stalking of RM?
Family in Bel Air?
Find the barber in LA - someone cut that hair. That person will at least know (maybe well) or recognize the work
Revisit the LA victim to assure her he is gone; Ask her if there is anything else she can remember
They said she was young. She must still be petrified. If she knows he is across the country or at least was across the country as of 12 days ago, this may give her some comfort to speak.
If she was afraid to say if she ever saw him at a camp, or at a school, on the street, anywhere, for fear he would come back, maybe now she will feel more comfortable disclosing this.
jmo
he is not a meticulous planner because he left DNA at 2 crime scenes- does not care or he is impulsiveI guess I'll look again. Whichever it was, he knew it was there and he wasn't worried about it.
So, Q is how did he know there weren't more? How was he so sure there wasn't another (or 2) facing the street, or even inside?
moo
VERY TRUE!he is not a meticulous planner because he left DNA at 2 crime scenes- does not care or he is impulsive
he might have had some connection to someone in the house-"friend of a friend" sort of thing and then he did this- maybe they thought they had a name but it was fake. why he is now 3000 miles away.... if he is involved in something like smuggling the "people who know him" may not be stepping up to ID him IMO.
I was just going to say that !Cross country truck driver would be my guess.
Sorry if I missed it, I've just scanned 12 pages to catch up, but do we know how he entered the home? All they have is him leaving? TIA if you know.Looked to me like home security camera, not a doorbell camera. It was high up right? That's where my front door one is too. Not concealed either so I bet theirs wasn't.
The guy was brazen. He knew enough to turn away from the camera but didn't care enough to worry about the fact that there were cameras there to start begging the Q -- Did he know the property? Know how many there were and where they were? Did he work at or in the property ever?
Was he one of the installers of the cameras?
So many questions from that little 2 second clip they released.
Just bizarre
Sorry if I missed it, I've just scanned 12 pages to catch up, but do we know how he entered the home? All they have is him leaving? TIA if you know.