Last edited by a moderator:
According to the video in the post following yours, the ex who couldn’t get Crumbley to pay $67 a week in child support says he bought Ethan any thing he wanted.Ethan Crumbley is not affluent, not getting the connection other than both have crappy parents. Couches parents did everything they could to protect their son, the Crumbley’s ran and left their son to fend for himself.
In light of what we know about the meeting with the parents though, I can’t help but wonder what the school would have done if I hadn’t picked him up.
Would they have made good on their threats or would they have given him another chance because it was his first “offense”?
James, Jennifer Crumbley arraigned after Oxford shooting
James and Jennifer Crumbley, the parents of suspected Oxford High School shooter Ethan Crumbley, are expected to be arraigned Saturday and charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter.
You can watch the arraignment live here.
I guess it depends on how you define affluent , the Couche’s were mega millionaires wealthy and argued that the son’s affluent lifestyle contributed to him not knowing that driving intoxicated was wrong. They used their mega wealth to protect him. I think the two families had very different lifestyles MOOAccording to the video in the post following yours, the ex who couldn’t get Crumbley to pay $67 a week in child support says he bought Ethan any thing he wanted.
She says he makes six figures, so at least $100,000 a year is doing ok, if not affluent. She would know from court ordered income statements for child support.
Do you think sentence will be concurrent or consecutive if found guilty ?At the arraignment -
JC - Involuntary manslaughter - 4 charges, punishable of up at 15 year in prison and/or $7,500 fine.
She's crying.
Statement from the attorneys ahead of the arraignment.
https://twitter.com/mikerreports/status/1467138371344637953
You may be surprised at the schools in low crime rural areas like Maine and Carroll Co. VA who pro actively installed metal detectors because they noticed school shootings are not happening because of gangs in high crime areas.I have worked at many schools, where going through a metal detector is the norm. With security who also wands kids as well. It can be done. And is done at a lot of schools, for the last 25 years.
However, these are usually schools in gang areas, or schools already targeted for high risk volatile students. Working in these schools, you don't even have a pair of scissors in your desk. I have seen pens and pencils used as weapons, so kids had crayon pencils to write with.
Do all schools need to go to that? I believe that teaching school should be considered a high risk job, and there should be a lot of proactive measures to increase school safety, but, as usual, no one is proactive, everything is reactive.
Arraignment: