I'll be watching it. Right now it's Nancy Grace on another channel. I am shocked by how poorly she understands the facts of the case. She outlined her little scenario and said how could Karr take the child from under her parents' nose, eat pineapple with JonBenet, lounge around, and write the ransom note.
Even a person who only read a little about the case knows that this is not the likely sequence of events.
Nancy Grace is also very offended by Karr's flight, and his shrimp and champagne and not being handcuffed, and allowed to wear a tie. Does she say all these things just to make good TV and anger people? This has an explanation (regulations, routine, rules; he's not likely to commit suicide with his tie) and is not done to offend the public, for heaven's sake.
Can we get her off the air? I am watching only because she has the girl whose yearbook Karr signed. That is a scoop, but she's not doing a very good interview with her. Still, better than nothing.
PS I see Glenn Beck is another idiot who has his own show on that channel, he spent time mocking Karr and the entire case and he actually said the story is not Karr, it's child pornographers. Sorry Glenn but right now the story is Karr and did he or did he not do it.
LKL is coming on in a minute. Nancy Grace did point out the handwriting matches; that was good journalism. I haven't seen anyone else do them side by side on tv. The unusual d's and a's I noted right away are visible to anyone. It's not rocket science, but then it's also not considered hard evidence; a jury has to decide.
Then she interviewed someone about the Xmas photos of the Karr family that were found: Karr is not in them.