Juballee, I feel somewhat compelled to address WM and the assumption that the new Waterloo facility was somehow doomed or worse yet, somehow sabotaged by a competitor. Also, the attacks on AS, insinuating that he was incompetent are unwarranted and potentially damaging to this poor soul who's only fault was that he agreed to be identified in a news article. MOO
In defense of WM, IMO, WM knew exactly what he was doing and had more than enough assets to continue. WM & CM were well documented in Aviation history and IMO WM had an "expert" level of industry knowledge along with an ATPL and capital to boot. The Millards were
very experienced operators as an AMO. IMO, without full knowledge of the CAR's surrounding air carriers, aircraft maintenance, knowing the difference between an AMO & MRO, type ratings, certifications etc, and other Transport Canada requirements involving aircraft, it is impossible for anyone to critique this new MRO in any intelligent and meaningful manner. MOO
IMO, as a holder of a Transport Canada CPL, I have found the conversation surrounding AS, as if he was the "main man" and reason for the plug being pulled on the new MRO frustrating. IMHO, with hundreds of hours of studying and classroom hours for my CPL, which does contain a tremendous amount of Air Taxi maintenance requirements, I would still have to make inquiries to a licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer (with experience in this exact type of operation) to get all the details of what the personnel and other requirements would be necessary prior to even obtaining an MRO. IMO, even then it would not be an easy answer and I'm certain that they would be referring to CAR's in their answer to make sure they had all their bases covered. MOO
http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/regserv/cars/menu.htm
IMO, WM did know what he was doing, WM was extremely familiar with CAR's, WM did have enough capital and WM did have the ability to make his MRO a huge success. WM's biggest mistake is that he didn't have a son that shared his vision. JMHO.