Blue Girl1991
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2016
- Messages
- 245
- Reaction score
- 503
MooseMeMuch
This is one of the posts regarding Stacy's blood footprint ,
From the Member Mote , I almost sure that Missouri Mule also mentioned the blood footprint .
Mote post :
Could someone please enlighten me about this alleged bloody footprint on the outside of the house? I'm having trouble excepting this.
"It seems the consensus is it would have belonged to Stacy McCall since she was barefooted. The obvious conclusion would be that she cut her foot on the broken glass. The thing I'm hung up on is wouldn't there have been a visible blood trail or at least some droplets of blood elsewhere?
I've read nothing that would indicate blood inside the home or blood outside the home except for this lone spot. There wasn't any precipitation reported on June 7th or June 8th in Springfield, so they couldn't have been washed away.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this because I'm leaning toward this bloody footprint as being total bunk?
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...since-June-1992-6/page22&p=8588462&styleid=26
A few quotes from former central time:
I have heard about this but as unliked separated points. Meaning...
A) A blood sample of Stacy’s (matching her DNA) was found on the door frame of the Levitt house.
B) A footprint belonging to Stacy was found in the living room facing to the door.
Point ‘A’ would close the book on anyone who questions whether the girls made it home that night, we have a slam dunk that she was there...somehow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the police have an idea who did it or who are considered strong suspects then I can understand that in the first years they didn't release the names In order not to compromise the investigation but after so many years there is nothing to lose,
why not mention them now? it can put pressure on them and somebody from their circle of their families or friends might come forward.
I also think that a huge money reward would bring people to talk not because they have conscience but because the temptation of the money.
I totally agree , all the very cold cases that solved give real hope the this case will be solved too
This is one of the posts regarding Stacy's blood footprint ,
From the Member Mote , I almost sure that Missouri Mule also mentioned the blood footprint .
Mote post :
Could someone please enlighten me about this alleged bloody footprint on the outside of the house? I'm having trouble excepting this.
"It seems the consensus is it would have belonged to Stacy McCall since she was barefooted. The obvious conclusion would be that she cut her foot on the broken glass. The thing I'm hung up on is wouldn't there have been a visible blood trail or at least some droplets of blood elsewhere?
I've read nothing that would indicate blood inside the home or blood outside the home except for this lone spot. There wasn't any precipitation reported on June 7th or June 8th in Springfield, so they couldn't have been washed away.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this because I'm leaning toward this bloody footprint as being total bunk?
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...since-June-1992-6/page22&p=8588462&styleid=26
A few quotes from former central time:
I have heard about this but as unliked separated points. Meaning...
A) A blood sample of Stacy’s (matching her DNA) was found on the door frame of the Levitt house.
B) A footprint belonging to Stacy was found in the living room facing to the door.
Point ‘A’ would close the book on anyone who questions whether the girls made it home that night, we have a slam dunk that she was there...somehow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the police have an idea who did it or who are considered strong suspects then I can understand that in the first years they didn't release the names In order not to compromise the investigation but after so many years there is nothing to lose,
why not mention them now? it can put pressure on them and somebody from their circle of their families or friends might come forward.
I also think that a huge money reward would bring people to talk not because they have conscience but because the temptation of the money.
I totally agree , all the very cold cases that solved give real hope the this case will be solved too