scadagirl28
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2016
- Messages
- 229
- Reaction score
- 331
What are the chances that Cox, Garrison, Carnahan and the grave robbers were all in the area at the time of abductions .? What a nightmare for families and LE.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is a interesting crime scene. Glass globe broken but bulb is intact and on. The door, the mailbox and potted plants all in place. Rock garden of white stones all in place. The picnic table umbrella is on one side in front of Levitt's car. Does anyone know if she kept it like that ?As the detective said nothing looked right. That is as good an explanation as any. And it was compounded by the visitors to the home prior to the police being called who corrupted what would have been a pristine crime scene.
In my opinion the investigation was steered off the tracks when the chief cleared the grave robbers. This crime should have been solved 25 years ago.
There is a second or even a third crime scene where the women were taken to and murdered. We dont know where those were.
Also, I am curious as to anyone thinking that Larry Hall could be responsible for this? I read a book on him and concerning his methods, I feel he could have (not saying did) done this. Thoughts?
This is something interesting to me. Larry Hall drove a van that matched the wittinesses description, and was said to be in the area when the crimes took place. Was Larry Hall and a buddy at George's Steak House that night?
This is something interesting to me. Larry Hall drove a van that matched the wittinesses description, and was said to be in the area when the crimes took place. Was Larry Hall and a buddy at George's Steak House that night?
This interview is absolutely interesting, revealing things to, at least, stop to consider about Larry Hall in relation to the Springfield case:
http://truecrimediary.com/index.cfm?page=cases&id=174
The Hall brothers could hardly be described as "clean cut" as the waitress remembered. So no
What's interesting if that if it was indeed Cox then that would completely change the entire theory of the case in that being Stacy was actually the target while Ms Levitt and Suzee were instead at the wrong place at the wrong time.
x and the
But is it a fact that Stacy knew him? I have never read such assertion.[
Same here. Never read that they knew each other or even knew OF each other. What I gathered is Stacy and her sisters occasionally brought Dad his lunch. I'm not sure what job either man had (with the dealership) I've always gotten the impression they did not work 'together'. I've always 'assumed' (uh oh) that Cox washed the cars (after being in the shop) and Stacy's dad was 'higher up' in the ranks...possibly a salesmen or service writer (?) ......but 99% positive the men did not work in the same area of the dealership.
I think Cox has to be the prime suspect. He and Stacy at least "knew of" each other and is someone that possibly could had gotten into the house under a ruse such as to use the phone due to "car broken down" ect. Since Stacy knew he worked at her dad's place that could had been just enough to lend a helping hand. Cox could had spotted them out late that night going by the store and followed them home. Whoever did this crime was indeed able to gain access without breaking in. And Cox's gf at the time did give him a false alibi. And Cox is a cold-blooded murderer
How did a couple of shaggy looking men like the Hall brothers able to gain access into the house without breaking in? At 2:30 AM
How did a couple of shaggy looking men like the Hall brothers able to gain access into the house without breaking in? At 2:30 AM