chaplain1
New Member
Jeff would sue somebody here for the fame of solving this case. That would make him more money in the long run and make him one of the greatest attorneys ever. There is no physical evidence in Jacobs case.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The person suing has to agree to the terms of the suit, not the person who is getting sued.
So the suer decides if it is going to be revealed or not.
The suer could sue for money, drop the money part and then reveal the info.
Does that make sense?
If a lawyer screws up, give the Lawyers Professional Responsiblity Board the info
I contacted the Star Trib in response to a series of articles they had written about St. John's. I was hoping to get some kind of additional investigative resources for the Guimind case. Like all of the media and agencies I endeavered to communicate with, the paper was not interested in delving deeper into the devious deeds at St. John's. Thankfully the local Fox News station took up the challenge a few years back. Other than that I haven't seen the case get much coverage.
Sounds like the resources are there.
Now for the evidence
Just read Joy's latest blog about the older man with a wood panel vehicle. My only comment is if this was a balding, older man, there's a good chance after nearly 26 years that he's no longer with us.
http://www.joybaker.com/2015/03/29/the-party-in-the-woods-part-2/
Several years ago there was a man that his co-workers thought might have been Jacob. Of course it wasn't. Anyone know the name of that man or have his pic?
I'm currently reading Eloc's book, and I'm trying to wrap my head around something.
The BCA claimed they had 863 files of missing children in the state of Minnesota in 1989 ("at the time of Jacob's abduction"), and of those 863 files, 97%....the vast majority of them were "runaways". They Claim only 15 children were gone under suspicious circumstances. I think not.
Who believes this?
I was reading that the Jacob Wetterling Foundation was focusing the funding to educate families who may become victims of stranger abductions, and give written guidelines to law enforcement. Doesn't the BCA and FBI know these specific "guidelines", and can't they work with local LE to implement these "guidelines"? And if only a tiny fraction of missing children are actually stranger abductions, then why all the funding focusing on "stranger abductions", and why not more focus on WHY there's so many runaways (97%)? The main objective for the funding is for child abduction prevention. So in essence, the JWF main objective is not equal to what the BCA is saying about missing kids.
Obviously, the BCA is not telling the truth.
Didn't the "foundation" change to a "resource center now". I think this happened in the last few months.
Several years ago there was a man that his co-workers thought might have been Jacob. Of course it wasn't. Anyone know the name of that man or have his pic?
Trino, somehow I think he's still around...
One of the early struggles of the Wetterling Foundation was to get law enforcement and the government in general, to recognize the vast difference between stranger abductions and family-related abductions. It was really interesting reading all those old articles, many, many of which were in the St. Joseph Newsleader.