It still seems odd to me that he would get a letter from Patty and hang onto it for six years and never respond at all. He says it was pleading with him and/or accusing him. Since he has made such a big deal out of wanting to clear his name, that would have been the ideal time to respond, IMO.
If he didn't want to have anything in writing, he could have called her at that time. So his response of "well, yeah, of course. Twenty years is long enough to not talk" when she asked to talk to him seems pretty disingenuous to me.
From transcript of DR interview with Julie Nelson:
Rassier says the file contained newspaper clippings, videotapes of news and a letter from Patty Wetterling.
"Was that letter addressed to you?" asked Julie Nelson
"It was addressed to me but it looks like it went through the sheriff's department. It was basically pleading with me to basically accusing me that I did it and that would you please end this whole thing and let's wrap this up and come forward."
Rassier received that letter six years ago, but never responded. Then, last October, he ran into Patty outside his health club.
"She asked me if I could talk and my just reaction was
well, yeah, of course. Twenty years is long enough to not talk. So, we sat down and talked for about an hour," said Dan.
He says Patty asked several times if Dan was responsible for Jacob's disappearance. He, said no.
Rassier says the fact investigators found nothing on the farm should give everyone hope.
"That Jacob could be alive somewhere. Wouldn't that be a dream? It could happen. The hope is there and if we have hope then we have something," said Rassier.
http://archive.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=875817