cherrymeg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 2,786
- Reaction score
- 10,469
Then why does Asher say it was used?
He has info you and Bartt don't simply have.
How many times has this been answered for you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why does Asher say it was used?
He has info you and Bartt don't simply have.
Are you always disingenuous? I have proven every claim.Repeating lies, harassing verified members and never showing proof of your claims or showing what you think is proof but is really just you twisting words around is crazy. You are talking in circles. I know shouldn't be feeding a troll but your words to effect real people.
Not even once.How many times has this been answered for you?
Then why does Asher say it was used?
He has info you and Bartt don't simply have.
Did he lie about Bartt? You're conflating agenda with truth.Why did Asher say a lot of things that were not true? Why did he exclude Joe? Why did he say those things about Bartt?
Thanks for clarifying. I never believed those things said about you anyways.
If none of the grave robbers had a car (Mike said this) then it seems likely that Suzie's car could have been used at one point. Mike did say in the past that Dusty loved driving it because it was a "GT." (his words).
I want to speak one more time on my issue with Mike Clay: he's had 27+ years to mull over this case, he (and wife as proxy) come onto forums, make statements, retract statements, change statements (Suzie "friend" comment, Dustin's alibi), and anytime the matter of Garrison is brought up, literally called to a grand jury -- as real as it gets regarding this case, he deflects and blows it off as nothing? Why?
He hasn't given additional thought to why a criminal, who angrily took a gun into a bar, got busted for it months after the disappearance, might have some connection to information that the police say is "prime info" (their words) about the abductions? Clay dismisses it as "just had pot one time" and "Garrison said I had the power of the wind."
We're to believe that? He could help us! But it's always and remains being a game. Time to stop being vague. Want this solved? Get the guts to help.
How can truth come from retracted and opposing statements?
What statements were opposing and retracted? Mike deciding he was actually friends with Suzie after talking to Bartt about his sister is just changing your mind after reevaluating.
Mike had to "grow up" from 2012 to 2015? Not buying it. It took him from age 40+ to decide Suzie was a friend?And growing up or growing as a person.
How can truth come from retracted and opposing statements?
Mike will gain a lot more credibility when he discusses his relationship with Garrison and how he and his friends became to know him.
Dusty is directly connected.
Mike bought weed off him.
Garrison had a gun in an establishment Cathe worked. (The establishments she worked, Mike documented, Steve had a gun taken into one of them. Source: Steve's case files from 1993--if mod needs to see them I can show)
He knew her when he was a teenager. His version of friendship back then might have been different. Even if they only hung out for a few months their lives were both changed when she disappeared. Standing up for her on here and being able to give her a voice and clear up rumors.Mike had to "grow up" from 2012 to 2015? Not buying it. It took him from age 40+ to decide Suzie was a friend?
Did Cathe work at Foxy's and Pink Cadillac?When did Mike deny any of the connections other than the one with his sister which I have no idea what you are talking about. He bought pot off him once. Mike asked Cathe once about a club Garrison was said to frequent and she said she never knew of him and did not ever work in the club that was mentioned at the time. I don’t know if it is the same one you are talking about now. You do realize that showing SG did that does not prove Cathe worked there?
How can truth come from retracted and opposing statements?
Mike will gain a lot more credibility when he discusses his relationship with Garrison and how he and his friends became to know him.
Dusty is directly connected.
Mike bought weed off him.
Garrison had weapons around Mike, and the establishment his sister worked.
No I just add more because I don't want to keep posting back to back. It's not a big deal and I'm never lying. The only non-fact I ever stated was Culley's/Community center. And I happily owned up to it. The other things are directly from Mike's posts.Need to start screenshotting your post because they change every time I get back on.
Why was a multi-offender felon given a really low bond to go talk to cops about this case and this case only? One that was linked to Suzie via Recla/Clay?
After having an illegal firearm to boot...?
31393CF0112 - ST V STEVEN EUGENE GARRISONShow your work.
Look her up on Casenet Missouri. It will answer all your questions.Did Cathe work at Foxy's and Pink Cadillac?
Answers are in the 1993 gun charge.