The forensics alone do not implicate anything except that one of the McCanns lost bodily fluid in some very odd places.
The forensic confirmation relevant DNA at the sites alerted to by the Cadaver Dog, however, is an entirely different story, as is the
way the DNA was left in the car trunk. It is believed something dripped down a wheel well.
I'm sorry but your claim to have a better understanding of the DNA results than Amaral was pretty much invalidated for me when you said this -
Originally Posted by brit1981
The only dna identified at an alert site was identified as belonginf to gerry mccann.
To which I replied this -
Incorrect. DNA was found which belonged to Kate and Madeleine or Amelie also.
From: "Prior Stuart" <Stuart.Prior@leicestershire.pnn.police.uk>
To: "Task Portugal" <Task.Portugal@leicestershire.pnn.police.uk>
Sent: 04 September 2007 10:14
Subject: FW: Op Task - in Confidence
>From: Lowe, Mr J R [mailto:John.Lowe@fss.pnn.police.uk
>Sent: 03 September 2007 15:01
>To: stuart.prior@leicestershire.pnn.police.uk
>Subject: Op Task - In Confidence
Stuart
Firstly, here are the last three results you are expecting...Within the DNA profile of Madeline McCann there are 20 DNA components represented by 19 peaks on a chart...Of these 19 components 15 are present within the result from this item;..."Is there DNA from Madeline on the swab?"
It would be very simple to say "yes" simply because of the number of components within the result that are also in her reference sample.
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id268.html
Madeleine's DNA is made up of 50% Kates and 50% Gerrys, therefore it goes without saying that Kate's DNA was found also.
You are the only one misinterpeting the DNA.
That phrase is your phrase.
I only stated there is involvement with different governments at diplomatic level (proven) which is highly unusual (proven) as while all expats will get diplomatic help in a crisis, very rarely do they require it from a third, totally uninvolved Government. (proven).
As far as I can see, I'm one of the few who is posting information which actually is factually correct.
See my response to Madeleine's DNA not being found.
You continually accuse me of posting misinformation, I constantly provide black and white proof, you then ignore it to skip on to the next track of the ever repeating broken record of McCann defence.
In the interests of furthering the debate, please offer a credible alternative scenario which fits the evidence...otherwise, please stop repeating the spin. It's old, it's tired, it's almost farcical.
The McCanns claims of innocence need something more tangible than just constantly repeating "we're being picked on and here's how" to be credible, in my opinion.