SleuthyGal
Former Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 4,078
- Reaction score
- 1
I think instead of assuming guilt or innocence it's more straightforward to look at his statements that he told police, compare them to statements that he put in his affadavit and see which statements are in conflict with each other (not trying to make them fit any particular scenario of innocent or guilty).
If he lied about a detail or time or whatever then put a checkmark against the statements that are in conflict.
If you find that there are several lies (or inconsistencies if you prefer that term), you need to ask yourself WHY this guy would lie? Can you trust his stories? Can you determine which version of his conflicting statements are true? Which one is the 'truth?' What is the real story?
If he lied about a detail or time or whatever then put a checkmark against the statements that are in conflict.
If you find that there are several lies (or inconsistencies if you prefer that term), you need to ask yourself WHY this guy would lie? Can you trust his stories? Can you determine which version of his conflicting statements are true? Which one is the 'truth?' What is the real story?