HRCODEPINK
Verified Insider
That is exactly my thinking. Privilege or not, there is a difference between not disclosing communications made by the client and breaking the law. An attorney is not allowed to let another crime be committed when he knows it is about to occur, that is not privileged. He is not allowed to physically hide evidence. That is different than disclosing its location.
But lets use some of the teenage crimes we have seen, perps A and B kill someone and then tell their friends where the bodies are, friends C, D, and E all go into the house to check it out instead of calling the police (or remaining silent). They are potentially destroying a crime scene and would either be prosecuted with their friends or forced to turns states evidence.
I would like to hear the audio on that tape and see what the context of being in this location was.
They would also be guilty to misprision, which is used far too infrequently. In this case it seems there may be a ton of it!