I do get what you are saying. But there are things that are not something police could have planted.
ie
a message from teresa halbach on barb janda's message machine
a bleached pair of brendan's pants found 5-6 months later via barb janda telling police about a conversation with brendan the night of the alleged murder.
a bus driver saying she saw Teresa taking photos at 3:45
teresa telling coworkers she was uncomfortable with Steve Avery
multiple phone calls by avery the day of the alleged murder and calling under a fake name (b.janda)
Nothing is a smoking gun but rather evidence that could have value, but do I believe this is all planted by police and irrelevant ? nope.
If Avery is innocent, he likely is happy that people are scrutinizing every detail as maybe one minor piece of truth uncovers lies.
ie - that valet key. What if there is crime lab evidence that was in the Rav4 ? I've never heard it mentioned that it wasn't the primary key for the vehicle.
I think it's good for people to question it all, without a preconceived notion of what the actual truth is.
I respectfully request you do some research if you are genuinely concerned about what the actual truth is.
1. There was a message on Barb Jandas machine. This is about the only thing that is correct in your post.
2. The jeans with bleach spots were introduced at Brendans trial. There were small spots on both left and right pocket areas and some on the bottom of legs. No blood or blood stains were found.
3. The garage was sprayed with Luminol. Mostly small spots 1 to 1.5 inches diameter were found. One smear approx.. 3 x 4 was found behind the riding mower. Bleach will glow under Luminol examination. NONE OF THE SPOTS TESTED POSITIVE FOR BLOOD.
Source for the above: Brendan Dassey trial transcripts.
http://pastebin.com/S1DERiFb
4. Ill check, but I dont think Brendan or his mom ever tried to delay turning over the clothes he wore on Oct. 31. Maybe the jeans were collected later. Thanks for reminding me to check that fact or perhaps you can give us a link?
5. Other testimony contradicted the bus driver timeline. The bus driver did say she saw Teresa taking photos
at a later time than Teresa should have been there, according to the time it takes to drive between the last stop she made at the Zipperers and Avery Salvage. This testimony was stipulated to in BDs trial transcripts:
That if called to tref -- testify, JoEllen Zipperer would testify that on October 31, 2005, Teresa Halbach came to the Zipperer property to take a photo of a vehicle for AutoTrader Magazine.
Zipperer would indicate that Halbach was at her residence between approximately 2 to 2:30 p.m. Was there for approximately ten minutes. Was wearing a white top, waist-length
jacket, and blue jeans.
Zipperer would state that before leaving, Halbach provided her with the latest AutoTrader-Magazine and a bill of sale. Left her
property and drove away in her SUV.
Zipperer would finally state that Avery Salvage Yard is no more than a ten-minute drive from her residence in Manitowoc County.
6. WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THAT TERESA TOLD CO-WORKERS SHE WAS UNCOMFORTABLE WITH STEVEN AVERY? From what Ive found, this was not introduced into trial. But feel free to correct me if Im wrong. It may have been in a pre-trial motion, but was considered unreliable hearsay with no exception.
Did you know Teresa had been to the Avery yard FIVE TIMES prior to Oct 31[SUP]st[/SUP]?
7. SA called twice prior to THs arrival using *67, and once after she took photos without the *67.
8.
SA didnt call under the fake name B. Janda, The receptionist knew it was SA calling and he made the appointment under the name B. Janda. It was B. Jandas van that was the object of photography and sale in the Auto Trader magazine.
Teresa knew she was headed to Avery Salvage that day so any imagined attempt by SA to fool her with the B. Janda appointment is silly, it would never have worked because of the address and her previous 5 trips to the property.
Blank bills of sale and the latest issue of Auto Trader were left with the two previous stops that day exactly as SA described THs visit to him that day.
HERE ARE THE FACTS PRESENTED at BDs trial, (wish SAs transcripts were available, but they used much of the evidence in Brendans trial).
These are the stipulations on the record regarding Teresas co-workers
Brendan Dassey Trial Transcript / Day 4
Pages 183-185
Stipulations in lieu of testimony of Auto Trader co-worker(s):
Number two. That if called to testify, Angela Schuster would testify that Teresa Halbach was hired as a photographer for AutoTrader in October, 2004, and continued in that employment through October 31, 2005.
Schuster would further state that Teresa Halbach had performed photo shoots at the Avery salvage business on five occasions prior to October 31 in 2005, including June 20, October 22, October or, excuse me. Let me start again. June 20, August 22, August 29, September 19 and October 10.
Number three. That if called to testify, Dawn Pliszka would testify that on October 31, 2005 she received a phone call from Steven Avery at approximately 8:12 a.m., at which time Avery requested that, quote, the same girl that had been out here before, end quote, come to his property to take photos of a van he had for sale.
Pliszka would further state that Avery made the appointment under the name, quote, B. Janda, end quote, and that Pliszka left a voicemail for Teresa Halbach at 9:46 a.m. asking if she could make the appointment.
Number four. That if called to testify, Dawn Pliszka would further testify that at 2:27 p.m. she did speak with Teresa Halbach on Teresa's cell phone at which time Ms. Halbach indicated that she was, quote, on her way, end quote, to the Avery property from her previous appointment.
That is the entirety of that stipulation. It will be marked as Exhibit 205?
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Im trying to be a good example of a WS poster here. Lets not stoop to spreading the unsubstantiated rumors and innuendo the other forums do. If you want to discuss the facts, then please spend some time helping me parse out facts versus things that may be unsubstantiated rumor or evidence deemed too unreliable to be admitted. I could use the help. Its time consuming.