Compassionate Reader
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 2,357
- Reaction score
- 119
Pam has a whole different interpretation for those pictures that were posted on that blog, not to mention that she didn't give permission for them to be posted. She went on that outing for the sake of her grandchildren, to protect them. She said that she spent most of the time in the car. The pictures were for the grand kids (and Amanda). They were not made to be published on the Internet.
What proof is there that the killer was in the woods before the boys arrived? The killer could have arrived in the woods after the boys did just as easily. It's also possible that the killer followed the boys into the woods.
Michael told a friend at school on May 5, 1993, that he was going to his "secret hideout" after school. If the boys went into the woods, the logical assumption is that the "hideout" is in the woods. So, IMO, it is more logical to believe that the boys were there first.
What proof is there that the killer was in the woods before the boys arrived? The killer could have arrived in the woods after the boys did just as easily. It's also possible that the killer followed the boys into the woods.
Michael told a friend at school on May 5, 1993, that he was going to his "secret hideout" after school. If the boys went into the woods, the logical assumption is that the "hideout" is in the woods. So, IMO, it is more logical to believe that the boys were there first.