MsFacetious
What a Kerfuffle...
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 21,624
- Reaction score
- 33,029
So I think I understand it all now ...
That was confusing for a while!
- Dogs hit on an area of disturbed dirt
- Anthropologist was called in to determine whether the area had artifacts which would indicate this could be a Native American or early settler burial site. It was determined to be "a newer burial site".
- More cadaver dogs were called in to validate the "human remains hit"
- Now LE can begin excavating and process the remains.
Not to mention... these dogs will hit on an area that used to contain a body.
So someone could have buried a body there... then recently moved it... and all of this could be for nothing.
I hope they did use ground penetrating radar.
Say there WAS a body there... and then someone came down and moved that body on a camping trip.
Say LE had a GPS on that person's vehicle so they know where that person went on their camping trip.
Then after going there, that person just went back to their hotel... or to eat... or to the store... and didn't go to any other wilderness areas.
So, LE assumes that he moved the body TO this location, rather than FROM it. Or just checked to make sure it was still there.
Has anyone considered that the body may have been taken from this "possible grave" and just taken to wherever the person was going next?
Almost everywhere has dumpsters... and that has actually happened before.
Where someone went and got the body years later and then threw the bones in the dumpster... just a thought...