Anyway, I'm still wondering, what are you finding in the Sanderses accounts to prompt you to take issues with them being disregarded? Also, have you found anything to support Echols' claim of having been on the telephone during the hours in question, or why did you bother bring it up?
Mind you, all I have reviewed are the investigatory notes, statements and interviews, but if you are to take them at their word, you have the following:
Around 3:30, there is a three way telephone conversation between Jennifer Bearden, Hollie George and Damien according to Holly George's 9/10/93 statement and Jennifer Bearden's statement of 9/10/93.
Jennifer Bearden calls Damien back about 30 minutes later at Jason's and talks to Damien for about 5 minutes, at which time Damien and Jason have to leave according to Jennifer Bearden's 9/10/93 statement.
At around 4:00 or shortly before that, Joe Hutchison, Pam Hutchison and Michelle Echols pick up Damien and Domini at the laundromat according to their statements taken on 9/10/93, along with Domini Teer's statement of the same date.
At about 5:00, Pam, Joe, Michelle and Damien arrive home after dropping off Domini and stopping by the pharmacy according to the same statements (less Domini's obviously).
Around 6:30, Pam, Joe, Michelle and Damien go to the Sanders according to those same statements. This is also confirmed by Jennifer Sanders in her 9/2/93 statement, Stacy Sanders in her statement of 9/2/93 and by Meredith McKay in her statement of 9/3/93.
By 8:00, Pam, Joe, Michelle and Damien arrive home according to each of their statements.
Some time after 7:30, Jennifer Rearden tried to call Damien but he wasn't home (which would be consistent with them being on the way home from the Sanders).
At approximately 9:20 or 9:30, Jennifer Rearden calls again and speaks to Damien according to her statement of 9/10/93. This is consistent with Joe and Pam's statements of 9/10/93 indicating Damien spoke on the phone until past 10:30.
If one were to accept these statements as true, Damien's whereabouts are accounted for from the time the children were last seen until approximately 10:30. So my only point regarding both the Sander's visit and the telephone calls is that you would have to disregard those statements or not believe them in order to believe Damien was involved. Now, they may very well be lying. I'm in no place to judge that right now but in order for him to be involved, all or some combination of those individuals have to be lying.
If you accept these statements as true, are you suggesting that there is still a window of opportunity for Damien to be involved and each of these people to be telling the truth? Or are you saying there is other information I am missing, or possibly misinterpreting the statements?