Bruce O. had probably been leading TM on for a long, long time; promising to leave Allison, calling it off, promising again and so on.
If it was TM who issued the ultimatum for 1 July it was probably because she had finally had enough of being led on. The trauma of frustration, distress, futility, anger ... over and over can be so frustrating.
Bruce O. should just have had the decency to tell her the truth - that he would never be hers.
Going by a link Keentoknow posted yesterday re prisoners...they all seem to come up with nicknames for each other. I wonder what GBC's will be...brucey??...burger man??
Bruce.....how pooncy can one man possibly be???
Yeah flashbacks would be an issue. He's probably medicated already I'd say. They often are when a suicide risk.
IMO
It does my head in trying to make sense of what went on with the Baden Clay/Frost/Broom thing. LOL :crazy:
Unless I truly am crazy, I remember some posts some time ago stating that he had a business called Oasis Finance and that TM was a part of it too. Anyone else remember?
I reckon Gerry was watching the news hosted by Bruce Paige and saw an item regarding Simon Overland and went *bazinga!*
Toni sat on her backside and said nothing while the search went on for days and nights, and Mr and Mrs Dickie became unhinged with grief as did Allisons daughters.. the only time she co operated with the police, and this after having to be hauled in by them, she didnt volunteer,. was when her little tacky dream went to *advertiser censored* when the evidence of Gerards other pants activities were revealed to her.
so excuse me for not seeing Toni as a victim in all this.. I'll pass on that one, thanks.
Psychopaths rarely suicide...it isn't in their mind-set.
Psychopaths rarely suicide...it isn't in their mind-set.
The Phone Man; Mustard Man; Little Bit Hurt ManGoing by a link Keentoknow posted yesterday re prisoners...they all seem to come up with nicknames for each other. I wonder what GBC's will be...brucey??...burger man??
Ah the one after m##chans!!!
Quick one, Does anyone have proof for when TM actually first was in contact with the Po po?
I suspect that she had to 'trip off to work' to support her children.
As for emails, if she had deleted them unread she would have been destroying evidence.
Very unlikely that she went on with her dream ...
When he arrived; "For Sale"
After a week ; "Under Offer"
After a month ; "Sold"
After a year; "Registered Unsafe property"
After 20 years; "Permit for demolition issued"
Good to hear the fundraising for the girls is going well.
I've been mulling things over and despite what was supposedly put up by the CP at the bail hearing, about TM's contact with GBC regarding an overlap at a conference, I'm perplexed.
I guess it would be a really easy thing to resolve if you knew ABC's friends/work colleagues, or if you were in the REIQ admin, to know which conference ABC were going to.
Personally and its just MOO, she was not going to a Real Estate Property Management conference. It just to me doesn't make sense. Sure she might have been mentioned on the Century 21 website but I can't see her really having an involvement in the agency or the business (maybe through company shares/directorship but not active?)
I think it much more likely that it was a conference relating to her own interest/expertiese - psychology - development of resilience in children - training.
I remember the link to Pathways was mentioned a lot early on, and that a poster said the hairdresser told her they had been questioned, and that ABC was talking about a Pathways seminar the next day. Can't find anything, but I remember googling a bit a long time back and finding another organisation that was linked, that had something going on 20th. (dratted brain cells and that you don't write things down at the time!!!)
Maybe it doesn't turn on much anyway, it's just I wonder if the police mis-interpreted what TM said, if she said "I told GBC to tell his wife that we would both be at the same conference tomorrow" but she didn't mean she and ABC, she meant that she (TM) and GBC were both booked to go to the REIQ conference and she was worried that ABC might find out they were crossing paths.
In any case, is there any way to find out if TM went to the conference after all?
I know of barristers who say to their clients, don't tell me if you are guilty or not. I will never ask either. But tell me everything else . . . .
I know this enables the lawyers to do their jobs of arguing for their client to the best of their ability, and I suppose it helps them sleep at night too, but it's something I just can't seem to stomach.
Is this something that lawyers are taught during Law 101? The guilt of your client is not relevant, only whether you can win the case for them or not? Your job is to get them off, period.
Not trying to cast aspersions in any way, I'm just trying to get a handle on the issue of client guilt from the brief's point of view.
Maybe he had other fake names too. Possibly a fake passport in the name of Bruce Overland in his getaway bag ready for his escape ... only the QPS were too smart for him.