Norway Norway - Arjen Kamphuis, 47, Dutch citizen, Bodø, 20 Aug 2018

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently Arjen had pitched his tent: Daar in de buurt trof een visser de kajak, de tent en het paspoort van Kamphuis aan. Waarom hij midden in de natuur zijn bivak opzette, is vooralsnog een raadsel.
Wat is er gebeurd met cyberexpert Arjen Kamphuis? | TROUW
Zee also post #163 by Worldwatcher.

So: he leaves his hotel with a heavy load, takes the train to rognan and then from Rognan, he walks carrying his kayak weighing 15 kg, his tent and all his stuff to some quite spot not far from the railway, not far from where the Kayak was found.

Could he have taken a bus along that road? Or perhaps a lift? Didn't anyone see him pass by, loaded as a donkey? Wouldn't he have been some kind of an eyecatcher?

People claim to have seen him down South, in a "non-eyecatching state". Then why would no one have seen him in Rognan and surroundings?
 
So: he leaves his hotel with a heavy load, takes the train to rognan and then from Rognan, he walks carrying his kayak weighing 15 kg, his tent and all his stuff to some quite spot not far from the railway, not far from where the Kayak was found.

Could he have taken a bus along that road? Or perhaps a lift? Didn't anyone see him pass by, loaded as a donkey? Wouldn't he have been some kind of an eyecatcher?

People claim to have seen him down South, in a "non-eyecatching state". Then why would no one have seen him in Rognan and surroundings?

First of all, it is not mentioned a tent in any norwegian media so I dont know if he had one with him as long as he stayed at hotels all the holiday. It is almost none bus connections in the evening in Rognan and it is quite a bit to walk from the railway station outside the centre and to where the kayak was found. I am in the impression that the kayak was floating in the fjord and things floating in the fjord normally is found in that spot where they found the kayak. If he had plans to take the train to Trondheim he didnt have much time to walk from the railway station through the centre of Rognan, out on the E6 (Europa road) and to the place where the kayak was found and then paddle before it was too dark and walk back all the way again. So I guess he found a place within the centre of Rognan - it is a fjord camp there so thats maybe the best place to go out for a short paddle in the evening.

We dont know if anyone have seen him in Rognan - the police have got over 80 tips about him and they need time to process them. The day he disappeared where the first day of school after the summerholiday and it is only 2500 inhabitants there, and most of them lives outside the centre. I guess people there are used to see tourists during the summer season.
 
Search for Arjen Kamphuis goes under water

Bodø - The Norwegian police think that the disappeared cyber-expert Arjen Kamphuis may have had an accident. Therefore, searches will also be done belowe the surface of the water for a trace of the Dutchman.


Last week a fisherman found items from Kamphuis in the fjord, including his ID card. A few hundred meters away the Dutchman's folding canoe was found.

If Kamphuis has had an accident, there are two possibilities: either he is still alive and needs help, or he has died.
The police take both scenarios into account, according to Walla in AD. Other possibilities are that Kamphuis does not want to be found or that he has been the victim of a crime.

The Kamphuis case keeps the people in the north of Norway quite busy. The area is mainly known for its overwhelming natural beauty and not for its series of mysterious disappearances. Walla in the AD: There are six to eight investigators on the case. We spend a lot of resources on it, this has great priority. Since Monday we are assisted by two Dutch investigators.

In the next few days the Norwegian coastguard will be added to the army of detectives: "They have equipment with which we can search a larger area. Also under water. What exactly are we looking for? For any trace."


BBM



Get in the search dogs that found every part of Kim Wall's remains!
 
Apparently Arjen had pitched his tent: Daar in de buurt trof een visser de kajak, de tent en het paspoort van Kamphuis aan. Waarom hij midden in de natuur zijn bivak opzette, is vooralsnog een raadsel.
Wat is er gebeurd met cyberexpert Arjen Kamphuis? | TROUW
Zee also post #163 by Worldwatcher.

So: he leaves his hotel with a heavy load, takes the train to rognan and then from Rognan, he walks carrying his kayak weighing 15 kg, his tent and all his stuff to some quite spot not far from the railway, not far from where the Kayak was found.

Could he have taken a bus along that road? Or perhaps a lift? Didn't anyone see him pass by, loaded as a donkey? Wouldn't he have been some kind of an eyecatcher?

People claim to have seen him down South, in a "non-eyecatching state". Then why would no one have seen him in Rognan and surroundings?


No tent was found near Rognan. This article has clearly been written by someone who is not on the case. I imagine his boss told him to write something about Arjen Kamphuis, he googled a bit, read something about a tent that was found. He overloooked the fact that the tent was not found near Rognan, and missed the later news entirely that this tent had nothing to do with Arjen.

As far as we are aware, Arjen was staying in hotels for at least 10 days and probably made day trips in the Bodø area.
 
Interview with chief investigator Bjarte Walla

What do you think has happened to Arjen Kamphuis?

"We have three hypotheses so far. The first is that he may have had an accident in which he died or is still alive but needs help. The second is that he wants to remain hidden himself. The third is that he is a victim of a criminal offence. We have reason to believe that Arjen took the train to Rognan the afternoon after he checked out from Bodø. We don't know if he arrived there. Yes, he may have gotten off at an intermediate station. The last signal from his phone was received that day in the area where we found his belongings this week."

Last Tuesday evening a fisherman saw these items floating in the seawater of the fjord, near the Kvænflågettunnel between Bodø and Rognan. A few hundred meters away from the fjord the same evening the police found the folding kayak that Kamphuis had bought just before his departure to Norway in the vicinity of Amsterdam.

What kind of items are these? Also his passport, as a Norwegian TV station reported?

"In the interest of the investigation I can't say that. We did announce the news about the kayak, because it is a large and heavy object - it weighs 15 kilos. We hoped that people might have seen him carry it with him. Unfortunately that didn't result in any tips.''

There are tips from witnesses who claim to have seen Kamphuis ten days later in the vicinity of Stavanger.

"That is true. But we do not yet know if they are reliable. Well that there, in Vikeså, late in the evening of August 30, a signal was also received from a German sim card that we think is from Kamphuis. That phone has been switched on for twenty minutes to an hour. After that we never heard a signal from the phone again. In total, we received about eighty tips, including from people who claim to have seen him in Denmark. We check every tip.''

What did Kamphuis do in Bodø before he disappeared off the radar?

"We know he spent ten days in the area, within a radius of seventy to eighty kilometres. He slept in the city. We assume that he made trips and enjoyed the beautiful nature."

Alone or with others? Bodø is a place where tourists pass by on their way to the Lofoten or the far north, not a holiday resort. However, your largest cyber defence centre in Norway is housed on a mountain just outside the city. Has Kamphuis been there? Has he met people who are attached to it?

"We do not have any information to indicate this. But the surroundings here are also great for hikes. There is nothing unnatural about staying here longer.''


What do you think, with all your experience? Is the most likely scenario that Kamphuis deliberately erased his traces? He knew better than anyone how that can be done.

"Gut feeling should not play a role, we should stick to the facts and avoid tunnel vision. For the time being, we don't have enough evidence for one of the three scenarios, so we'll keep all options open.''

How will the investigation proceed?

"In the next few days we will be assisted by the coastguard. They have equipment that allows us to search a larger area. Also under water. What exactly are we looking for? For every trace."



BBM



On the day that Arjen Kamphuis disappeared, the last signal of his phone came from the area where his belongings and his kayak were found this week.

The later pings near Vikeså are unconfirmed.


 
No tent was found near Rognan. This article has clearly been written by someone who is not on the case. I imagine his boss told him to write something about Arjen Kamphuis, he googled a bit, read something about a tent that was found. He overloooked the fact that the tent was not found near Rognan, and missed the later news entirely that this tent had nothing to do with Arjen.

As far as we are aware, Arjen was staying in hotels for at least 10 days and probably made day trips in the Bodø area.
Basicly I do find the newspaper Trouw reliable source but it could be that you are right ...

Anyway just some questions..is wild camping allowed in Norway?
Did Arjen like to fish? Could it be that he wanted to do,some nightfishing and set up a bivaktent?
From what I understand is that a bivaktent is very basic to shield you from weather influences,like wind,rain etc

From what I understood/read is that he arrived at the end of the day..with a few hours to go...
-from daylight untill twilight
 
The train has no stops between Fauske and Rognan, so the only other option is to change and take the bus from Fauske to Rognan and go of the bus earlier.

Wildcamping is allowed in Norway, but normally not for more than two days at the same place. In the area where the kayak was found it is not really any places besides the sea to tent or sleep if you dont like to sleep on stones, the train track or the road.... If he took the train he would arrive at Rognan about 17.30 and the police thinks he planned to take the night train to Trondheim 22.21 so not much time there.
 
Last edited:
Basicly I do find the newspaper Trouw reliable source but it could be that you are right ...

Anyway just some questions..is wild camping allowed in Norway?
Did Arjen like to fish? Could it be that he wanted to do,some nightfishing and set up a bivaktent?
From what I understand is that a bivaktent is very basic to shield you from weather influences,like wind,rain etc

From what I understood/read is that he arrived at the end of the day..with a few hours to go...
-from daylight untill twilight

Find one other independent source that claims a tent was found near the kayak.
There isn't one.
All references in MSM about a tent are about a tent that a) was found in a different area near Bodø and b) it turned out that this tent had nothing to do with Arjen.

Trouw is spreading fake news. They do not have a reporter in the area, it is all desk work. Check with their reporter if you like and ask if he is certain about the tent. He can't be.
 
Find one other independent source that claims a tent was found near the kayak.
There isn't one.
All references in MSM about a tent are about a tent that a) was found in a different area near Bodø and b) it turned out that this tent had nothing to do with Arjen.

Trouw is spreading fake news. They do not have a reporter in the area, it is all desk work. Check with their reporter if you like and ask if he is certain about the tent. He can't be.
It is just my opinion,that is all
 
Interview with chief investigator Bjarte Walla

What do you think has happened to Arjen Kamphuis?

"We have three hypotheses so far. The first is that he may have had an accident in which he died or is still alive but needs help. The second is that he wants to remain hidden himself. The third is that he is a victim of a criminal offence. We have reason to believe that Arjen took the train to Rognan the afternoon after he checked out from Bodø. We don't know if he arrived there. Yes, he may have gotten off at an intermediate station. The last signal from his phone was received that day in the area where we found his belongings this week."

Last Tuesday evening a fisherman saw these items floating in the seawater of the fjord, near the Kvænflågettunnel between Bodø and Rognan. A few hundred meters away from the fjord the same evening the police found the folding kayak that Kamphuis had bought just before his departure to Norway in the vicinity of Amsterdam.

What kind of items are these? Also his passport, as a Norwegian TV station reported?

"In the interest of the investigation I can't say that. We did announce the news about the kayak, because it is a large and heavy object - it weighs 15 kilos. We hoped that people might have seen him carry it with him. Unfortunately that didn't result in any tips.''

There are tips from witnesses who claim to have seen Kamphuis ten days later in the vicinity of Stavanger.

"That is true. But we do not yet know if they are reliable. Well that there, in Vikeså, late in the evening of August 30, a signal was also received from a German sim card that we think is from Kamphuis. That phone has been switched on for twenty minutes to an hour. After that we never heard a signal from the phone again. In total, we received about eighty tips, including from people who claim to have seen him in Denmark. We check every tip.''

What did Kamphuis do in Bodø before he disappeared off the radar?

"We know he spent ten days in the area, within a radius of seventy to eighty kilometres. He slept in the city. We assume that he made trips and enjoyed the beautiful nature."

Alone or with others? Bodø is a place where tourists pass by on their way to the Lofoten or the far north, not a holiday resort. However, your largest cyber defence centre in Norway is housed on a mountain just outside the city. Has Kamphuis been there? Has he met people who are attached to it?

"We do not have any information to indicate this. But the surroundings here are also great for hikes. There is nothing unnatural about staying here longer.''


What do you think, with all your experience? Is the most likely scenario that Kamphuis deliberately erased his traces? He knew better than anyone how that can be done.

"Gut feeling should not play a role, we should stick to the facts and avoid tunnel vision. For the time being, we don't have enough evidence for one of the three scenarios, so we'll keep all options open.''

How will the investigation proceed?

"In the next few days we will be assisted by the coastguard. They have equipment that allows us to search a larger area. Also under water. What exactly are we looking for? For every trace."



BBM



On the day that Arjen Kamphuis disappeared, the last signal of his phone came from the area where his belongings and his kayak were found this week.

The later pings near Vikeså are unconfirmed.


[/QUO
 
At least some of my questions were answered by the article from ZaZara above. Interesting that they seem to have phone pings from Bodo area during the 10 days and from the area where the kayak was found.
 
On the day that Arjen Kamphuis disappeared, the last signal of his phone came from the area where his belongings and his kayak were found this week.

The later pings near Vikeså are unconfirmed.

It is certainly a plot twist that is in line with Ancilla's concern if it were AK's phone pinged in Rogaland on August 30. Especially in the light of this sentence, "The last signal from his phone was collected that day at the place where we found stuff from him this week." On September 6, the information on the enabled mobile phone is published and I suspect the police before the publication has investigated this technical trail for a few days. Why is the police waiting for more than a week and only when finding AK possessions, focuses on the area around Fauske/Rognan?

Was it his private or working phone that signaled in Fauske / Rognan on August 20th?
The Dutch or German sim card that signaled?
Was the phone used actively or just pinged?
 
Now that it seems that the investigation is focussing by searching under water (sadly) I came across this website link and for people who posted/followed the thread of the search of Jos B (supect murder of Nicky Verstappen) it must ring a bell- Signi Search Dogs!

Signi search dogs is the most active when, in a certain area, a person is (possibly) drowned, whose location is unknown or when the place of drowning is doubted. The dogs search from the boat or from the waterfront for human scents, which suit a drowned person. After working out the smell, the dogs point out the location of the drowned victim, on the water surface, above the drowned person. In this way, the victim can be salvaged in a more targeted manner. For the dogs there are no restrictions regarding the depth of the water, the temperature of the water and the type of water (sea, river, canal, etc.). There are also hardly any restrictions regarding the time of drowning (hours / months / years).

Why search with dogs?
  • By locating with dogs, the area in which a drowned person can be located is greatly reduced . Underwater equipment and divers can be used much more specifically.
  • Because the dogs can search a large area in a relatively short time, Signi can find people who would otherwise be untraceable.
  • Due to directions from the dogs, victims can become 'visible' under water, otherwise untraceable , due to depth, steep slopes or irregular soil.
  • The use of the dogs increases the chances of a faster recovery of the victim and certainty for the relatives.
How can a dog locate a drowned person?
  • From the water a mixture of peelers, fatty acids and gases (decomposition gases and anal gases) comes to the water surface.
  • The gases are taken away by the wind, the dog smells the gases and reacts to them.
  • The dog starts to bark and wag.
  • The smell is "worked out" by dog and handler to the place where the "smell source" is the strongest.
  • At the spot where the solids reach the surface of the water, the dog jumps into the water, swims to the location and starts swimming around the odor source.
The location on the water that the first dog has designated is recorded using a GPS. Then, if a second verification dog identifies the same place, a buoy will be placed in the water at this location and the place will be further elaborated with supporting means:



Sonar equipment
Signi search dogs are themselves in possession of an H umminbird , a side-scan sonar in combination with a 360-degree sonar, which can be used very diverse. Because the dogs greatly reduce the search area, interpreting thesonar images can provide a quicker answer . The sonar can also be used to target a diver or a drift to a location. The Humminbird is combined with a GPS

Underwater equipment
Signi search dogs has several underwater cameras. In this way, a body of a drowned person can be visualized under water, or an object can be viewed. Signi search dogs also has a metal detector. This way, for example, a car can be detected under the sand .

Treble equipment
Signi search dogs has their own specialized treble , with which a drowned person can be dredged up. This is important if diving due to currents or low water temperatures is made more difficult.

Boats
Signi search dogs has 3 own boats , so Signi search dogs can be used on any type of water .

Deep vision
Deep Vision makes its very advanced ROV (underwater camera) available if necessary.
GT
Vermissing te water | Stichting SIGNI zoekhonden
 
No tent was found near Rognan. This article has clearly been written by someone who is not on the case. I imagine his boss told him to write something about Arjen Kamphuis, he googled a bit, read something about a tent that was found. He overloooked the fact that the tent was not found near Rognan, and missed the later news entirely that this tent had nothing to do with Arjen.

As far as we are aware, Arjen was staying in hotels for at least 10 days and probably made day trips in the Bodø area.

Find one other independent source that claims a tent was found near the kayak.
There isn't one.
All references in MSM about a tent are about a tent that a) was found in a different area near Bodø and b) it turned out that this tent had nothing to do with Arjen.

Trouw is spreading fake news. They do not have a reporter in the area, it is all desk work. Check with their reporter if you like and ask if he is certain about the tent. He can't be.

Thank you Zazara for your input.

It is true that no other newspaper has mentioned the tent at the same spot where the Kayak was found.
However, newspapers mentioned "belongings" -in plural- found near the kayak, not specifying which "belongings". So I assumed that the tent could have been one of those "belongings" that had been found.

Then there was that Norwegian news item saying that the kayak had been found already "pulled on shore" (perhaps the shore near his tent?).

I'm aware that Arjen had stayed in hotels, but who knows, he might have preferred to spend his last night in the outdoors? What ever his decisions, how did his phone end up 700 km down South?

I don't know Trouw well, would be bad for them to spread fake news. No tent for the moment, till further notice.
 
I never read about Trouw,spreading "fake news" but I could be wrong...
The articles from that newspaper (that I read and caught my interest) was verified and had facts from both sides.
So I do agree with you about AK's other belongings,we do not know,what was in it...

This is yesterdays post from the Guardian. (lot of known published news)
Speculation over fate of missing Dutchman linked to WikiLeaks but there is one friend who said this: "Carlo said Kamphuis had “gone off grid before. It can be good for the soul. I was worried before, and it is worrying now. But I have strong faith he will come back into the welcoming arms of his friends when he is ready, in his own time”.
I hope he is right
 
Interview with chief investigator Bjarte Walla

On the day that Arjen Kamphuis disappeared, the last signal of his phone came from the area where his belongings and his kayak were found this week.

The later pings near Vikeså are unconfirmed.


Can you explain what you mean?

The AD says that the sightings at Vikesa have not yet been confirmed. However, a phone signal had been detected on the 30th of August:
Maar we weten nog niet of die (die=the sightings) betrouwbaar zijn. Wel dat daar, in Vikeså, laat op de avond van 30 augustus ook een signaal is opgevangen van een Duitse sim-kaart die volgens ons (= police) van Kamphuis is. Die telefoon heeft twintig minuten tot een uur aangestaan. Daarna is nooit meer een signaal van het toestel vernomen.

According to the AD, the pings near Vikesa are reliable.
 
Can you explain what you mean?

I think this sentence creates the confusion (Without considering whether the event in Vikeså has been verified) If his phone signaled for the last time on August 20th, it does not work with the Vikeså signal on August 30th was the last. (He had two phones and maybe it´s; one is pinging in Vikeså and the other pinging in Rognan/Fauske)

"Het laatste signaal van zijn telefoon is die dag opgevangen op de plek waar we deze week spullen van hem hebben gevonden.''
 
Last edited:
I think this sentence creates the confusion (Without considering whether the event in Vikeså has been verified) If his phone signaled for the last time on August 20th, it does not work with the Vikeså signal on August 30th was the last. (He had two phones and maybe it´s; one is pinging in Vikeså and the other pinging in Rognan/Fauske)

"Het laatste signaal van zijn telefoon is die dag opgevangen op de plek waar we deze week spullen van hem hebben gevonden.''

so the above could not mean that it was the last signal of that day? If the signal was picked up again in Vikesa then it must have been in a faraday cage in between? It would ping in route if on or even if off? Still confused information I suppose.
 
About the tent; The information about AK ID papers comes from Norwegian TV2 and is also mentioned/confirmed by Ancilla, the police did not want to confirm the information. (Trouw received the European Newspaper Award in 2012, as I understand, they often write about Islam, a topic popular in the Fake News genre).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
1,876
Total visitors
1,942

Forum statistics

Threads
605,417
Messages
18,186,759
Members
233,355
Latest member
frankiterranova
Back
Top