CoolJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
- Messages
- 4,241
- Reaction score
- 2,132
Regarding witness statements here is the link to the JFK docu I was talking about
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vvV5v5wkpjg
the segment about witness confusion about where the shots came from starts at 34:00 and a minute later is the Iraq thing I was talking about.
So I would have we have the pretty similar situation here on some videos you hear people talking its firecrackers and that afters couple of salvos went by. It was a women on one video who even says the always say its firecrackers but this is a gun. I wouldnt put too much weight on testimony regarding where the shooting was heard and how many shooters appeared to be, because if we can learn something from JFK case where every audio/video recording, photo and statement was microanalysed for the last 54 years it is that such testimony is unreliable. We better stick to cold hard evidence, provided we will get some. The boston 25 fox affiliate should try to get more photos from the source that leaked the room photos and the hallway video.
So we should just disregard what the victims are saying? Like shouldn't even consider it?
People get sent to prison for life based solely on eye witness reports.
What about forensic acoustics? Is that cold hard enough evidence for you?
There is a crap load of evidence pointing towards multiple shooters. The only "evidence" pointing to a lone mad man is that is what the "authorities" are telling us. I'm sticking with what the facts are telling me, not what a scared sheriff is telling me. I'm sorry if that somehow offends people but I am stickler for the truth.