Or so he says....
Yup. I think these are the two overlooked people in the case. They'd almost certainly have some knowledge of each other, and Steven owes one of them a significant amount of money.
We don't know what the landlord said in the daily messages he left for Steven 1-5 Dec (or what was in the message he left for Steven's parents the next day)....but he had every right to be frustrated and angry. Not only did he have Steven behind three months on his rent, but Z had skipped out on them in mid-November with the roaster and without paying his rent.
Without those two incomes, the utilities were going to be shut off in the house -- making it harder to rent it out again. I'd be PO'd, blued and tattooed at those two guys.
Steven evidently had worked out "a plan" to pay off by the back rent in January. I just wish we knew if that plan was worked out *with* the landlord, or whether Steven told the landlord he had made up his own plan.
I think that would give us more information, about what kind of payment Steven thought he could come up with ... and whether Steven thought he had a job lined up without the help of his bishop. (As previously reporte,d the bishop had told Steven they'd find him a job "after the first of the year".)