sds71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 13,858
- Reaction score
- 149,778
Defamation of what character? He doesn’t have a good character to destroy! IMODonald Trump is suing E. Jean Carroll for defamation:
Former US President Donald Trump sued E. Jean Carroll for defamation, alleging she falsely accused him of rape after a jury in a civil trial found that he sexually abused her https://reut.rs/3Xtl6cs
Trump Countersues E. Jean Carroll for Defamation Over Rape Claims
The former U.S. President on Tuesday night filed a counterclaim accusing Carroll of trashing his reputation by publicly accusing him of rape during a May 10 appearance on CNN.time.com
Correct - his ancestors didn't immigrate here until after slavery had ended. I would posit, however, that his family has done plenty to exploit people post slavery JMOI saw the other day 45 said he is the only president not descended from slave owners.
Correct - his ancestors didn't immigrate here until after slavery had ended. I would posit, however, that his family has done plenty to exploit people post slavery JMO
AFAIK, his father was of Austrian descent (surname of Drumpf changed to Trump) and his mother is of Scottish descent.I saw the other day 45 said he is the only president not descended from slave owners.
Adam Klasfeld
@KlasfeldReports
News— The DOJ reverses itself in @EJeanCarroll v. Trump — deciding that the former president isn't entitled to Westfall Act immunity after all for his comments while in office.
The Justice Department explains why it "lacks adequate evidence to conclude" — under the legal guidance given to them by appellate courts — that Trump acted under the scope of his employment when he told reporters that Carroll wasn't his type.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.177.1.pdf
Could someone explain this? Never heard of this.Adam Klasfeld
@KlasfeldReports
News— The DOJ reverses itself in @EJeanCarroll v. Trump — deciding that the former president isn't entitled to Westfall Act immunity after all for his comments while in office.
The Justice Department explains why it "lacks adequate evidence to conclude" — under the legal guidance given to them by appellate courts — that Trump acted under the scope of his employment when he told reporters that Carroll wasn't his type.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.177.1.pdf