NY - 3 Univ. of Albany students charged with assault and falsely reporting a crime

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Students charged in race hoax crimes face University disciplinary hearing today. IMO, they are probably going to be formally expelled.

At least 2 UAlbany bus attack students won't be at hearing
Lawyers for 2 in bus case see bias in UAlbany process
By J.p. Lawrence Updated 9:47 am, Wednesday, March 9, 2016

ALBANY — Attorneys for two of the three University at Albany students charged in a fight on a CDTA bus said their clients will not appear at a scheduled student conduct hearing Wednesday.

A hearing before a student conduct board is scheduled when a student is facing suspension, dismissal, removal from residence or at the discretion of an administrator. Burwell has withdrawn from the school, UAlbany said, but she is not exempt from disciplinary proceedings, according to an email from Nancy Lauricella, executive director of community standards.

Mark Mishler, who represents Ariel Agudio, said his client remains enrolled and is committed to continuing as a student at UAlbany, but cannot testify in the school's disciplinary system because of the criminal charges against her.

"We anticipate her getting kicked out, and that's not fair," Mischler said.

Three women face disciplinary hearing at UAlbany

The University at Albany is set to hold student disciplinary proceedings this morning related to last month’s racial incident at the school, according to an attorney for one of the three women criminally charged.

A university spokesman said he could only generally talk about the process. He couldn’t talk about individual proceedings or even confirm proceedings will take place, citing federal rules.

He said the university process determines whether a student has violated the university code of conduct, something all students are held to. It does not determine whether a student has committed a crime.

The spokesman also highlighted a frequently asked questions list from the university that indicates that hearings are before a panel of faculty, staff and students and allow accused students to give statements, call witnesses and ask questions. Decisions can be appealed.

The internal process also often runs parallel to criminal proceedings.

“Due process does not require campus disciplinary proceedings to be postponed until related criminal matters are settled,” the university listing reads, “and thus the imposition of university discipline need not await the outcome of the criminal proceedings.”

http://www.dailygazette.com/news/2016/mar/08/0308_ualb/?print
 
Oh, this is truly sickening. Attorney for 2 of the accused students has released a 4 page "press release" calling the university conduct hearing an "academic lynching".

Frederick Brewington's four-page statement on behalf of Asha Burwell has nothing to do with the bus attack she's accused of participating in. He says UAlbany is disregarding her rights.

In a statement he released Monday, Brewington says the college "seeks a pound of flesh" and says they're about to "perform an academic lynching." It all comes down to the timing of the student conduct hearing.

According to Paul DerOhannesian, defense attorneys face this problem a lot.

"The dilemma is you may want your client to testify at the hearings being conducted by the university," he said, "but in doing so, you expose that person to perhaps making a statement that could be used against him or her in the criminal case."

March 7, 2016
UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY SEEKS POUND OF FLESH
AND DISREGARDS THE RIGHTS OF
THREE AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE STUDENTS
THIS STATEMENT IS RELEASED ON BEHALF OF ASHA BURWELL,
BY HER ATTORNEYS

The full, disgusting "press release" is at the link. What a crock. What about the "rights" of the 20 or so white students wrongly accused? What about the rights of the one who received death threats and had to leave the university? What about THEIR rights??

Geez-- I hope a bunch of those wrongly accused students sue these 3 hoaxers. They are the ones with REAL damages, IMO.


http://www.twcnews.com/nys/capital-...ed-in-bus-attack.html?cid=facebook_YNN-Albany
 
Statement from attorney:
 

Attachments

  • 1486807_674179749283138_831727900_n.png
    1486807_674179749283138_831727900_n.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 82
  • Statement3-6-16.pdf
    410 KB · Views: 6
This attorney, Frederick Brewington, (if I’m being polite) is pretty “disingenuous” about WHO actually investigated the incident, as well as WHO actually brings charges. The alleged incident occurred on a CDTA (Capital District Transit Authority—a New York STATE owned bus service) bus that makes a loop on and off campus, so most of the riders are students. The girls called 911 from their dorms—ON CAMPUS. The University police responded to their 911 call, because it was in their service area, and it was the University police that received their alleged false statements.

The University police worked in cooperation with the CITY police, to investigate the alleged crimes, and the video recordings taken on the CITY bus. Neighboring police departments work together all the time when crimes cross jurisdiction boundaries—this is not some evidence of a sinister conspiracy to deprive the women of their “rights”.

The results of that investigation, along with the video from 12 different security cameras on the city bus, and the statements of 35 witnesses on the bus, were referred to the Albany County District Attorney, David Soares. It is the District Attorney, not the Campus Police, or the Albany city police, that actually BRINGS charges.

Attorney Brewington absolutely knows that. This is no different than if something like a murder occurred on campus, or any violent crime or property theft. He is actively trying to confuse the situation, and mislead the public, IMO.

The University is well within their rights to hold a disciplinary/ student conduct hearing. The hearing is NOT open to the public. A student conduct hearing is not any kind of criminal proceeding—Mr. Brewington knows that.

This is the Student Code of Conduct, "Community Rights and Responsibilities" that each of the students is subject to. (21 pages-- a good read about the due process at the university-- and entirely consistent with what I know of the policies at other major universities.)

http://www.albany.edu/studentconduct/assets/University_at_Albany_CommunityRights8-7-15.pdf

http://www.albany.edu/studentconduct/community_rights_and_responsibilities.php

http://www.albany.edu/studentconduct/

2. Jurisdiction of the University’s Code of Conduct

The student code of conduct shall apply to conduct that occurs on University premises, at University sponsored activities and to off-campus conduct that adversely affects the University community, the pursuit of its objectives, or neighboring communities. A student may be charged with violating local, state and federal laws and also the campus code of conduct as the student is subject to double jurisdiction, having obligations both to the State and the University. (See "Double Jurisdiction: What Does It Mean and What are the Implications?" for further information:
http://www.albany.edu/studentconduct/double_jurisdiction.php.)

3. Inherent Authority for the Student Disciplinary Program

Section 356 of the Education Law empowers the University Council of each State-operated campus of State University of New York to make regulations governing the conduct of students, subject to the general management, supervision, control and approval of the Board of Trustees of the State University of New York. All programs for student welfare and conduct are entrusted to and administered by the President of the University at Albany on behalf of the University Council.

The President has delegated administration of programs for student welfare and conduct to the Vice President for Student Affairs. Enforcement of standards of conduct, University regulations, recommendations for new policies, or
modification of policies or regulations affecting student welfare and conduct are initiated through the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs. The Vice President has jurisdiction over the Student Conduct System.

In addition to Community Rights and Responsibilities, the rules, regulations, and procedures for The Maintenance of Public Order on campuses of the State University of New York, adopted by the Board of Trustees, are in effect at the
University at Albany. (See Rules for the Maintenance of Public Order:
http://www.suny.edu/sunypp/documents.cfm?doc_id=351.)

B. Hearing before a Student Conduct Board or Committee on Student Conduct

When the Referred Party contests the referral and/or is facing removal from residence, suspension or dismissal from the university, or at the discretion of the Student Conduct Administrator, a hearing will be scheduled. The Student Conduct Administrator may later serve as the Referring Party at a Student Conduct Hearing. Community Standards will make every effort to schedule hearings around students’ academic schedules only.
Hearings are conducted as follows:

I. Both the Referred Party and Referring Party:

a. Receive written notice of a hearing date, time and place at least 5 calendar days in advance;

b. Must represent themselves;

c. May have one advisor present. The advisor may not address the Student Conduct Body but may speak privately with the advisee during the proceedings;

d. Have the right to call witnesses who have direct knowledge of the incident;

e. Hear the description of incident and conduct charges (the Referred Party will then make a plea to
charges);

f. Have the opportunity to make an opening statement;
g. Have the opportunity to ask questions of each other and their witnesses;

h. May be questioned by the Student Conduct Body;

i. Have the opportunity to make a closing statement.

II. The Student Conduct System encourages student involvement in the conduct proceedings and relies on full and open discussion of cases with all parties concerned in order to render a fair judgment. The Student Conduct System is administrative in nature and, as such, is not considered a court of law where formal
rules of process, procedure or technical rules of evidence apply. (See the University’s supplemental policy “Double Jurisdiction: What does it mean and what are the implications?” for further information:

http://www.albany.edu/studentconduct/double_jurisdiction.php.)

III. Referrals involving multiple students for the same incident will be resolved at one hearing.

IV. Hearings are regarded as confidential and closed to all but the principals of the case, their witnesses, their advisor and Community Standards. Student Conduct Body Members in-training may observe.

V. An official audio recording will be made of the proceedings. This recording is the property of the University and will not be duplicated or released. Participants are prohibited from making their own recording during the hearing (including but not limited to audio, photographic and/or written recording). The Referred Party
and Referring Party may submit a written request to Community Standards for permission to listen to the official audio recording in a supervised location on campus. An official written transcript can be provided by the University at the requesting party’s expense.

VI. Evidence to be presented by the complainant(s) and respondent(s) during any hearing on the charges must be submitted to Community Standards at least two (2) business days in advance of the scheduled hearing. This evidence will be shared with the opposing party. The Student Conduct Body may exclude
evidence that has not been shared or adjourn the hearing to afford all parties the opportunity to review evidence to be presented during the hearing. Community Standards or the Student Conduct Body will make the final decision related to the admissibility of all evidence.

VII. It shall be the responsibility of the Student Conduct Body to determine the relevancy of testimony and written evidence.

VIII. Should the Referred Party or Referring Party fail to appear for a scheduled hearing, a finding will be made based upon the information available and sanction(s) imposed, if appropriate.
 
K_Z, I appreciate your posts. Thank you for standing up for truth and justice. This BS makes me sick and reaches further than many people realize.
 
This attorney, Frederick Brewington, (if I’m being polite) is pretty “disingenuous” about WHO actually investigated the incident, as well as WHO actually brings charges. The alleged incident occurred on a CDTA (Capital District Transit Authority—a New York STATE owned bus service) bus that makes a loop on and off campus, so most of the riders are students. The girls called 911 from their dorms—ON CAMPUS. The University police responded to their 911 call, because it was in their service area, and it was the University police that received their alleged false statements.

The University police worked in cooperation with the CITY police, to investigate the alleged crimes, and the video recordings taken on the CITY bus. Neighboring police departments work together all the time when crimes cross jurisdiction boundaries—this is not some evidence of a sinister conspiracy to deprive the women of their “rights”.

BBM. The women chose what to do, when to do it, where to do it, and lord only knows why they chose to do it. They chose to make up false allegations about a false incident on a city bus. They chose to call 911 from their dorms. They chose to tell lies about other students -- innocent students who did nothing to them.

Now they don't want to face the consequences. They need to check their privilege and be held accountable.
 
Well, if the students chose not to show up and participate in the Conduct Hearing process, then they have no legal grounds upon which to appeal the outcome. That's pretty clear. And they are surely going to be dismissed formally.

This is a good explanation of SUNY's "Double Jurisdiction" for student conduct issues:

Double Jurisdiction: What does it mean and what are the implications?

Students are obliged to comply with federal, state and local laws, as well as the University at Albany’s student code of conduct, Community Rights & Responsibilities. Some allegations of misconduct may result in criminal charges as well as a referral to the Student Conduct System. If a student is charged with violating the law and is also referred to the Student Conduct System, the student has obligations to both processes at the same time. The University is not required to defer to the criminal courts by cancelling or postponing the student conduct proceedings. The Student Conduct System is administrative in nature and, as such, is not a federal, state or local court of law where formal rules of process, procedure or technical rules of evidence apply.

Consequently, the outcomes of two different systems of justice (the Court System and the Student Conduct System) with different rules and procedures may result in different outcomes. Students involved in a criminal or civil case who enter plea bargains or who are exonerated in the criminal or civil courts must understand that they are still accountable to the standards and procedures imposed by the Student Conduct System at the University at Albany. For example, a student may agree to a plea of “adjournment in contemplation of dismissal” or to a lesser charge in the court system, but he/she is still independently subject to the procedures of the University’s Student Conduct System.

http://www.albany.edu/studentconduct/double_jurisdiction.php

Their attorneys are doing these defendants a grave disservice by spewing forth things like that "press release". Their attorneys should be explaining to them what "Double Jurisdiction" means, and assisting them in facing the hearing prepared to explain their actions.

Asha Burwell likely doesn't care about the conduct hearing, since she has already withdrawn from the university. I think all 3 of them will be formally dismissed from SUNY. If that happens, they will never gain acceptance again to any of the 60-odd campuses and programs of SUNY, and could be declined for traditional admission to other universities. This is going to follow the three defendants for a very, very long time--as it should. This is going to take at least 6 months to a year to conclude the court process, and carry out whatever their sentences are. IMO, it's a pretty sure thing they will be found guilty, with the evidence as it is. I'm actually hoping they get some jail time, as a wake up call.

I think if the defendants want to continue their education, for the next year or 2 they should confine themselves to online study. They need to complete the court process before even thinking about any other schools, IMO. I think they will certainly be found guilty of at least some of the charges, unless they plea. Even so, there will be fines and community service, at a minimum. Once they have put all that behind them, and emotionally and psychologically grown up a lot, then maybe they could explore going back to a traditional campus. IMO, these defendants should not be students on any campus at the present time. And certainly not in any communal living situation, such as a dormitory.

And quite honestly, I hope their attorneys, especially the fancy Long Island guy, charge them a huge amount of money for their services defending their sorry selves. They intentionally lied and lied and lied some more-- to say nothing of setting back race relations a whole lot, and falsely accusing innocent people of hate crimes. A lot of people were harmed by their behavior, and they should not get off easy, IMO.
 
Update on this race hoax crime. Not only were all three women indicted by a grand jury, but their charges were actually increased and upgraded May 3. They were arraigned on new charges the next day, and expelled on May 5. I am so glad that this is being pursued for criminal charges. This is not the first time there has been race hoax crimes-- these crimes are increasing in the past few years.

And good grief-- they rejected a plea deal that called for an apology???? They all need jail time, IMO. Two were expelled from the university; the third is suspended for 2 years. All are facing up to 2 years in jail. That is appropriate, IMO, for what these women did to race relations on campus, the damage to other students, and the increased costs and attention the university had to expend to deal with the ongoing fall out from this very nasty hoax crime. They deserve some jail time, IMO.

Three SUNY Albany students who assaulted bus riders then said they were attacked because they’re black were indicted, officials said Monday.

An Albany County grand jury approved enhanced charges of assault and falsely reporting an incident for Ariel Agudio, Asha Burwell and Alexis Briggs, said District Attorney P. David Soares.

Soares announced an array of charges against each of the women Monday. Agudio faces one count of assault, three counts of attempted assault, three counts of false reporting and three counts of harassment.

The three women, who pleaded not guilty to false reporting charges filed in a lower court in February, will appear for their arraignments on their upgraded raps in county court Wednesday.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...ted-racial-assault-indicted-article-1.2622206

http://wamc.org/post/indictments-ualbany-bus-assault-case#stream/0

http://news10.com/2016/05/02/3-charged-with-lying-about-cdta-bus-attack-indicted/

Their charges are all misdemeanors, which is unusual for county court. Criminal defense attorney Lee Kindlon said the indictment makes the case more serious.

“Now with the indictment, that means all negotiations have fallen through and now these young women, if they’re convicted of these charges, are facing up to two years in jail,” he said.

All three young women rejected a plea deal in April that would have demanded an apology. Agudio’s attorney, Mark Mishler, called the proposal unfair and unacceptable to this client.

Thankfully, 2 of the women were expelled from SUNY, and the other was suspended.

http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/UAlbany-women-punished-by-college-for-bus-attack-7396568.php

Ariel Agudio and Asha Burwell have been dismissed from the university and Alexis Briggs has been suspended for two years, according to an email sent Thursday by President Robert J. Jones to the UAlbany community.

The email, sent out 16 days after UAlbany decided the three women's student conduct cases, was released after the Times Union reported from a confidential letter informing Burwell she had been "disciplinarily dismissed" as of April 19.

http://www.academia.org/two-students-expelled-one-suspended-after-race-hoax-at-suny-albany/

https://www.insidehighered.com/news...ate-crime-accusations-suny-albany-looks-ahead
 
@K_Z many thanks for keeping this updated. I wonder what the harassment charge for Asha Burwell relates to? Will be interesting to see what else comes out about this incident.
 
Doubtful that this conclusion will make it into the national news cycle. And I would be absolutely shocked if Hillary Clinton tweeted out a retraction to her earlier support for their criminal hoax.

Alexis Briggs admits making up UAlbany bus attack racial bias claim

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Suspended University at Albany student Alexis Briggs tearfully apologized Tuesday while pleading guilty to her role in fabricating a story that she and two friends were victims of an alleged racial attack on a CDTA bus on Jan. 30.

"You knew it wasn't true?" Albany County Judge Stephen Herrick asked Briggs, who was recently suspended from UAlbany for two years.

"Yes," she answered.

Briggs pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct, a noncriminal violation similar to a traffic ticket. Under the deal, she must perform 100 hours of community service within the next 10 months and avoid any new criminal charges within the next year.

Briggs does not have to cooperate against her co-defendants, former college suitemates Asha Burwell, 21, and Ariel Agudio, 20, both of Long Island, who are headed to trial on allegations they concocted the story.

http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Third-UAlbany-student-in-bus-attack-case-due-in-8314745.php

An extraordinarily lenient sentence, IMO. And a real "non-apology". She's apparently only sorry FOR HERSELF that the hoax got as much national attention as it did-- she's not "sorry" for making up the hoax in the first place, or sorry for the hurt she caused the white student, the university, and race relations. I really hate these modern "non-apology" apologies that are crafted so cunningly. They show an utter lack of character, integrity, and empathy for others, IMO.


On Tuesday, reading from a sheet of paper, Briggs told the judge: "While I felt that the comments directed towards me were offensive, I regret that my actions while confronting the passengers on the bus escalated the situation. I also regret that the role I played in the aftermath that ensued, because I should have done more to correct the narrative and truthfully explain what happened on that bus. I regret attending the (campus) rally and never anticipated the tremendous attention that would be given to this story or the far-reaching effect it would have and am disappointed in myself for not handling things differently."

Little told reporters he hoped his client's apology finalized the incident for her. Briggs wants to put it all behind her, he said.

But for as little character, honesty, and integrity as she has, her two "friends" (who are sticking to their "not guilty" stories) have even less, IMO. They are completely morally bankrupt, IMO. They are unable to experience shame or guilt, or empathy.

I hope all 3 of them never, ever can escape the stigma of what they did. I hope they are widely scorned for the rest of their lives.

And I hope the white student who fled the university from the death threats after the false hoax claims, files a huge lawsuit against the NFL brother of Asha Burwell who threatened to kill him.

More:

http://wamc.org/post/former-ualbany-student-admits-making-cdta-bus-attack#stream/0

According to Little, Briggs will not testify against the two other women. "I think I set that straight from the get-go that that would not be any part of any plea deal."

Mark Mishler, attorney for Agudio, sat stoically in the gallery during Tuesday’s court appearance. He refused to speak with reporters.

Agudio and Burwell were expelled from UAlbany. Their cases go to trial in September.

Like her friends Asha Burwell and Ariel Agudio, Briggs was given a second chance to take a plea bargain to avoid prosecution in the January CDTA bus fight, an event some labeled a "race hoax."

***BBM. It took TWO chances and TWO offers for Briggs to "accept" a plea bargain. Yeah, a real upstanding young woman-- not.

http://news10.com/2016/06/21/suspended-ualbany-student-involved-in-cdta-attack-scheduled-for-court/
 
[h=1]Two accused of lying about fight on CDTA bus in court[/h]The hearing lasted five hours with a lot of it containing objections by the prosecution to questions asked by the defense attorneys.

Judge Roger McDonough repeatedly admonished Ariel Agudio's lawyer mark Moshler and Asia Burwell's lawyer Frederick Brewington for asking question outside the scope of this hearing.

The judge anticipates the trial will start in February and he said he expects it to last one to two weeks.
 
CBS 6 Albany - WRGB‏Verified account @CBS6Albany [video=twitter;857341044295389185]https://twitter.com/CBS6Albany/status/857341044295389185[/video]More
#BREAKING: Ariel Aguido and Asha Burwell, found guilty of 2 counts of falsely reporting an incident. http://cbs6albany.com/news/local/jury-asks-to-watch-surveillance-video-in-cdta-trial …


CBS 6 Albany - WRGB‏Verified account @CBS6Albany [video=twitter;857339886709477376]https://twitter.com/CBS6Albany/status/857339886709477376[/video]More
#BREAKING: @CBS6Heather reports both Ariel Aguido and Asha Burwell have been found not guilty of assault in CDTA bus case.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
3,891
Total visitors
4,056

Forum statistics

Threads
603,122
Messages
18,152,608
Members
231,657
Latest member
Joybird99
Back
Top