slashkiss
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 178
- Reaction score
- 628
I know my opinion is not a popular one here but I just do not think she "murdered" him. I do not like this woman. I think she is probably a pretty vile creature; however I find it too complicated of a plan with far too many moving parts for this to be some planned murder for insurance money or revenge.
- The missing plug is meaningless to me as that could have been removed at any point and would not have caused any significant problems for him to capsize and drown.
- His almost intoxication doesn't mean a lot to me either as I know far too may guys that drink and kayak/boat/hike/any outdoor thing you shouldn't be doing while under the influence.
- Witness account of her "throwing" herself into the water right before being rescued doesn't give me the confidence to say she must have killed him. Witness accounts are known to be inaccurate and from any kind of distance it seems far too shaky for me.
- Her behavior after the incident wasn't terribly odd to me either. Lots of people experience grief differently and maybe she wasn't that torn up about his death - that alone doesn't mean she caused it. People were criticizing her pictures at the animal sanctuary; however that was her sister's place so she was probably spending time with family like most people would do after an incident like that. People were criticizing her selfie hand sign picture; however if you actually looked into that it was a tribute to him as it appears to be something he would do.
I just think even when this goes to court it is going to be difficult to convince a jury that she caused this. She may have wished he was dead and she may have even not tried very hard to save him but that isn't murder. It just makes her a terrible human being and unfortunately there is no crime against that.
- The missing plug is meaningless to me as that could have been removed at any point and would not have caused any significant problems for him to capsize and drown.
- His almost intoxication doesn't mean a lot to me either as I know far too may guys that drink and kayak/boat/hike/any outdoor thing you shouldn't be doing while under the influence.
- Witness account of her "throwing" herself into the water right before being rescued doesn't give me the confidence to say she must have killed him. Witness accounts are known to be inaccurate and from any kind of distance it seems far too shaky for me.
- Her behavior after the incident wasn't terribly odd to me either. Lots of people experience grief differently and maybe she wasn't that torn up about his death - that alone doesn't mean she caused it. People were criticizing her pictures at the animal sanctuary; however that was her sister's place so she was probably spending time with family like most people would do after an incident like that. People were criticizing her selfie hand sign picture; however if you actually looked into that it was a tribute to him as it appears to be something he would do.
I just think even when this goes to court it is going to be difficult to convince a jury that she caused this. She may have wished he was dead and she may have even not tried very hard to save him but that isn't murder. It just makes her a terrible human being and unfortunately there is no crime against that.